Remote Argument Protocols

Parties scheduled to argue must complete the email registration form using the code provided by the Clerk's office. Approximately two hours prior to the start of the argument session you will receive an email to check-in for remote arguments. More details here...

In-Person COVID-19 Argument Protocols

Pursuant to directives from the Office of Court Administration in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, all visitors to the courthouse... Expand »

972
KA 22-01556

PEOPLE
    V
SARAH M. KLINE

Criminal Possession Weapon

     RYAN J. MULDOON SUB
     CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA SUB

973
KA 22-00343

PEOPLE
    V
AARON LUCAS

Rape

     NICHOLAS P. DIFONZO SUB
     MINDY F. VANLEUVAN SUB

974
KA 20-01192

PEOPLE
    V
CARLOS ORTEGA, JR.

Burglary

     JANET C. SOMES SUB
     SCOTT MYLES SUB

975
KA 20-00968

PEOPLE
    V
JULIO RESTO

Attempted Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

     BRAEDAN M. GILLMAN SUB
     PAUL G. LYONS SUB

PEOPLE
    V
ERICK O. FIGUEROA

Murder

  JONATHAN FREDERIC GARVIN 10
  NANCY GILLIGAN 10

977
KA 23-00571

PEOPLE
    V
BRIAN R. BUSSOM

Sex Offender Registration Act

     DAVID R. JUERGENS SUB
  NANCY GILLIGAN SUB

PEOPLE
    V
COREY CLINTON

Murder

  PAUL SKIP LAISURE 15
  MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 10

PEOPLE
    V
NAQUAN SUMLER

Rape

  BRADLEY E. KEEM 10
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

PEOPLE
    V
JEFFREY R. HICKEY

Attempted Assault

  BRADLEY E. KEEM 10
  JOSHUA J. TONRA 10

IN THE MATTER OF
ADAM M. C.

Terminate Parental Rights

     CHARU NARANG SUB
  MARY M. WHITESIDE 10

BRANDON P.
    V
JENNIFER M. C.

Paternity

  CAITLIN M. CONNELLY 5
  MARY HOPE BENEDICT 5

IN THE MATTER OF
KAMERON R.

Custody

  ROBERT J. GALLAMORE 10
  AMY LEIGH HALLENBECK 5
  SCOTT A. OTIS 10

984
CAF 22-00798

IN THE MATTER OF
KAMERON C. R.

Order of Protection

TO BE ARGUED WITH #983

IN THE MATTER OF
CLARISSA F.

Neglect

     VERONICA L. REED SUB
     ALLISON B. CARROW SUB
  DAVID J. PAJAK 5
  WILLIAM D. BRODERICK, JR. 10
  MINDY LYNN MARRANCA 5

986
CA 22-01627

CHERYL STEPHENS
    V
CITY OF BUFFALO

Default Judgment

SETTLED

987
CA 22-01888

CHERYL STEPHENS
    V
CITY OF BUFFALO

Vacate Judgment

TO BE ARGUED WITH #986

BARBERRY COVE, LLC
    V
TOWN OF HENRIETTA BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW

RPTL

  PETER J. WEISHAAR 15
  ROBERT L. JACOBSON 15

2006905 ONTARIO INC.
    V
GOODRICH AEROSPACE CANADA, LTD

Contract

  JOSEPH E. ZDARSKY 30
  JOHN W. CERRETA II 30

GAYLE BUNN
    V
FAXTON-ST. LUKE'S HEALTH CARE

Summary Judgment

  ANTHONY ALEXANDER MURAD 15
  ANDREW BORELLI 15
  EVAN ROSSI 15

CHRISTOPHER SMITH
    V
ANNA J. SMITH

Partition

  JANET D. CALLAHAN 15
  DANIEL J. PAUTZ 15

CHRISTOPHER SMITH
    V
ANNA J. SMITH

Partition

CHRISTOPHER SMITH
    V
ANNE J. SMITH

Partition

CHRISTOPHER SMITH
    V
ANNE J. SMITH

Partition

STACIE COMBS
    V
JULIE A. MADEJSKI, M.D.

Summary Judgment

  KATHLEEN M. SWEET 10
  THERESA M. WALSH 15
  HEDWIG M. AULETTA 15
  JENNA W. KLUCSIK 5

65 LAKE AVENUE, LLC
    V
LENDER CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.

Dismiss Complaint

  STEVEN W. WILLIAMS 15
  RICHARD ALAN MOORE 15

Calendars are Subject to Change

The calendars published here are for informational purposes only. The calendars are updated frequently but not immediately and may not reflect the status of each case posted.

Please contact the calendar department for the most current information if you have a question about the status of a case.

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.