1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
May Term

Tue May 23 Argument #525.1

CA 22-00816

WEBSTER GOLF CLUB, INC.
    V
MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY

Appeal and cross appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Elena F. Cariola, J.), entered March 29, 2022. The order and judgment, among other things, denied in part and granted in part the motion of defendant Monroe County Water Authority for summary judgment.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

508
KA 19-02367

PEOPLE
    V
CAITLYN ACOFF

Arson

     SHIRLEY A. GORMAN SUB
     SCOTT MYLES SUB

509
KA 22-01172

PEOPLE
    V
JOSE PONCE

Sex Offender Registration Act

     ROBERT WILLIAM WARD SUB
     BRADLEY W. OASTLER SUB

510
KA 20-00049

PEOPLE
    V
CHARLES R. FRANKLIN, JR.

Attempted Murder

     ERIN A. TRESMOND SUB
     MINDY F. VANLEUVAN SUB

511
KA 22-00970

PEOPLE
    V
EUGENE L. LIVELY

Criminal Possession Weapon

     KAREN LESLIE SUB
     MORGAN RILEY MAYER SUB

512
KA 18-01885

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JAMES R. WILSON

Criminal Possession Weapon

  MICHAEL JOS. WITMER 15
  MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 10

513
KA 21-01283

PEOPLE
    V
JASON A. INGLESTON

Burglary

     RYAN J. MULDOON SUB
     CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA SUB

514
CA 21-00432

NEW YORK STATE WORKERS' COMPENSATION
    V
EPISCOPAL CHURCH HOME

Summary Judgment

     CRAIG R. BUCKI SUB
     TODD C. ROBERTS SUB

515
KA 22-01398

PEOPLE
    V
VINCE M. FERRIS

Sex Offender Registration Act

     BRIDGET L. FIELD SUB

516
CAF 22-01136

IN THE MATTER OF
SPENCER M.E.

Adoption

     ROSEMARIE RICHARDS SUB
     CHRISTOPHER J. FERRATELLA SUB
     JOHN NICHOLAS DAGON SUB

517
CA 22-01705

PLAY

NAKEISHA SMITH
    V
MARSHALL FARMS GROUP, LTD.

Summary Judgment

     ERIC P. SMITH SUB
  MEGHAN M. BROWN 15

518
CA 23-00097

PLAY

AVION SYLVESTER
    V
KIMANI S. SANDERS

Discovery

  MATTHEW J. KAISER 15
  JOSEPH H. EMMINGER, JR. 15

519
CA 22-00529

PLAY

SAVE MONROE AVE, INC.
    V
TOWN OF BRIGHTON

CPLR art 78

  AARON M. SAYKIN 15
  JACOB H. ZOGHLIN 15
  JOHN C. NUTTER 15
  JOHN A. MANCUSO 15

520
CA 22-00537

PLAY

SAVE MONROE AVE, INC.
    V
TOWN OF BRIGHTON

CPLR art 78

521
CA 22-00538

PLAY

SAVE MONROE AVE, INC.
    V
TOWN OF BRIGHTON

CPLR art 78

522
CA 22-00552

PLAY

BRIGHTON GRASSROOTS
    V
TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD

Dismiss Petition

523
CA 22-01047

PLAY

RICHARD M. TALBOT
    V
KALEIDA HEALTH

Discovery

  ROBERT DAVID BARONE 15
  ERIN M. BRADY SWENSON 15

524
CA 22-00986

GERALD TRUAX
    V
M.D. MEYER'S PROPERTIES, LLC

Summary Judgment

     RICHARD C. BRISTER SUB
     STEPHANIE VISCELLI SUB

525
CA 22-00749

PLAY

LOUIS S. PETIX
    V
MICHAEL THOMAS RYAN

Summary Judgment

  JUSTIN S. WHITE 15
  WILLIAM ELMER BRUECKNER 15

525.1
CA 22-00816

PLAY

WEBSTER GOLF CLUB, INC.
    V
MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY

Summary Judgment

  DANIEL R. ROSE 15
  ALAN J. KNAUF 15
  STEPHEN A. DAVOLI 15
  ALLISON B. FIUT 15
  RICHARD T. BELL, JR. 10

525.2
OP 23-00359

PLAY

JAMES (NE NANCY) POWERS
    V
WILLIAM BOLLER

Original Proceeding Pursuant to CPLR art 78

  ALEXANDRA HARRINGTON 15
  HARMONY A. HEALY 15
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.