Term Notice

Remote Arguments ARE permitted at your discretion between February and May 2023 as part of a PILOT PROGRAM to study the efficacy of the Fourth Department's HYBRID operating model going forward.

Remote Argument Protocols

Parties scheduled to argue must complete the email registration form using the code provided by the Clerk's office. Approximately two hours prior to the start of the argument session you will receive an email to check-in for remote arguments. More details here...

In-Person COVID-19 Argument Protocols

Pursuant to directives from the Office of Court Administration in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, all visitors to the courthouse... Expand »

508
KA 19-02367

PEOPLE
    V
CAITLYN ACOFF

Arson

     SHIRLEY A. GORMAN SUB
     SCOTT MYLES SUB

509
KA 22-01172

PEOPLE
    V
JOSE PONCE

Sex Offender Registration Act

     ROBERT WILLIAM WARD SUB

510
KA 20-00049

PEOPLE
    V
CHARLES R. FRANKLIN, JR.

Attempted Murder

     ERIN A. TRESMOND SUB
     MINDY F. VANLEUVAN SUB

511
KA 22-00970

PEOPLE
    V
EUGENE L. LIVELY

Criminal Possession Weapon

     KAREN LESLIE 15
     MORGAN RILEY MAYER 10

512
KA 18-01885

PEOPLE
    V
JAMES R. WILSON

Criminal Possession Weapon

     MICHAEL JOS. WITMER 15
     MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 10

513
KA 21-01283

PEOPLE
    V
JASON A. INGLESTON

Burglary

     RYAN J. MULDOON SUB
     CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA SUB

514
CA 21-00432

NEW YORK STATE WORKERS' COMPENSATION
    V
EPISCOPAL CHURCH HOME

Summary Judgment

     CRAIG R. BUCKI SUB
     TODD C. ROBERTS SUB

515
KA 22-01398

PEOPLE
    V
VINCE M. FERRIS

Sex Offender Registration Act

     BRIDGET L. FIELD SUB

516
CAF 22-01136

IN THE MATTER OF
SPENCER M.E.

Adoption

     ROSEMARIE RICHARDS 10
     CHRISTOPHER J. FERRATELLA SUB
     JOHN NICHOLAS DAGON SUB

517
CA 22-01705

NAKEISHA SMITH
    V
MARSHALL FARMS GROUP, LTD.

Summary Judgment

     ERIC P. SMITH 15
     MEGHAN M. BROWN 15

518
CA 23-00097

AVION SYLVESTER
    V
KIMANI S. SANDERS

Discovery

     MATTHEW J. KAISER 15

519
CA 22-00529

SAVE MONROE AVE, INC.
    V
TOWN OF BRIGHTON

CPLR art 78

     AARON M. SAYKIN 15
     JACOB H. ZOGHLIN 15

520
CA 22-00537

SAVE MONROE AVE, INC.
    V
TOWN OF BRIGHTON

CPLR art 78

TO BE ARGUED WITH #519

521
CA 22-00538

SAVE MONROE AVE, INC.
    V
TOWN OF BRIGHTON

CPLR art 78

TO BE ARGUED WITH #519

522
CA 22-00552

BRIGHTON GRASSROOTS
    V
TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD

Dismiss Petition

TO BE ARGUED WITH #519

523
CA 22-01047

RICHARD M. TALBOT
    V
KALEIDA HEALTH

Discovery

     ROBERT DAVID BARONE 15

524
CA 22-00986

GERALD TRUAX
    V
M.D. MEYER'S PROPERTIES, LLC

Summary Judgment

     RICHARD C. BRISTER 15
     STEPHANIE VISCELLI 15

525
CA 22-00749

LOUIS S. PETIX
    V
MICHAEL THOMAS RYAN

Summary Judgment

     JUSTIN S. WHITE 15
     WILLIAM ELMER BRUECKNER 15

525.1
CA 22-00816

WEBSTER GOLF CLUB, INC.
    V
MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY

Summary Judgment

     DANIEL R. ROSE 15
     AMY K. KENDALL 15

525.2
OP 23-00359

JAMES (NE NANCY) POWERS
    V
WILLIAM BOLLER

Original Proceeding Pursuant to CPLR art 78

Calendars are Subject to Change

The calendars published here are for informational purposes only. The calendars are updated frequently but not immediately and may not reflect the status of each case posted.

Please contact the calendar department for the most current information if you have a question about the status of a case.

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.