Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, III, J.), entered January 11, 2021. The order, inter alia, directed defendant to transfer certain real property to plaintiff.
Felony Driving While Intoxicated
TONYA JEAN PLANK | SUB | |
SCOTT MYLES | SUB |
Attempted Robbery
MELISSA SWARTZ | 5 | |
BRADLEY W. OASTLER | 10 |
Criminal Possession Weapon
THOMAS MANNING LEITH | 10 | |
GARY THOMAS KELDER | 10 |
Attempted Burglary
PAUL SKIP LAISURE | SUB | |
SCOTT MYLES | SUB |
Criminal Possession Controlled Substance
MELISSA SWARTZ | 10 | |
MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II | 10 |
Mental Hygiene Law
DENNIS B. FELD | 15 | |
AMANDA MARIE TUCCIARONE | 10 |
Mental Hygiene Law
Summary Judgment
PHILLIP A. OSWALD | 15 | |
ELISE L. CASSAR | 15 |
Summary Judgment
BRIAN M. MELBER | 15 | |
STEVEN BRUCE BENGART | 15 | |
JENNIFER PERSICO | 15 | |
TIMOTHY M. HUDSON | 15 |
Support
PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR. | 10 | |
VALERIE R. HOUCK | SUB |
Original Proceeding Pursuant to CPLR art 78
Summary Judgment
AMOS WEINBERG | SUB | |
HOWARD A. MAGALIFF | SUB |
Contract
Summary Judgment
MICHAEL R. DRUMM | 15 | |
AMANDA C. ROSSI | 15 | |
LAUREN A. HEIMER | 15 |
Summary Judgment
TIMOTHY M. HUDSON | 15 | |
OWEN DEMUTH | 10 |
Dismiss Claim
JASON ROSS LEVINE | SUB | |
ALEXANDRIA TWINEM | SUB |
CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of
BERNARD KLEINMAN | SUB | |
OWEN DEMUTH | SUB |
CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.