Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

767
TP 20-00222

REGINALD ROSS
    V
ANTHONY ANNUCCI

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

     LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI SUB
     OWEN DEMUTH SUB

768
TP 20-00252

DWANE L. COX
    V
ANTHONY ANNUCCI

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

     LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI SUB
     MARCUS J. MASTRACCO SUB

769
KA 18-01961

PEOPLE
    V
RAYMOND LOVETTE, JR.

Criminal Possession Weapon

  BENJAMIN L. NELSON 10
  NANCY GILLIGAN 10

770
KA 18-01478

PEOPLE
    V
RAYMOND LOVETTE

CPL art 440

TO BE ARGUED WITH #769

771
KA 18-01804

PEOPLE
    V
MICHAEL J. BEARD

Murder

  MARY P. DAVISON 15
  SUSAN RIDER 15

772
KA 19-01962

PEOPLE
    V
ANDRE L. INGRAM

Attempted Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

     TODD G. MONAHAN SUB

773
KA 14-02245

PEOPLE
    V
KESEAN R. MCKENZIE-SMITH

Murder

  DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR. 10
  SCOTT MYLES 5

774
CAF 19-01010

RICHARD PHALEN
    V
JOLYNN M. GORSKI

Custody

  DAVID J. PAJAK 10
  CHARLES J. GREENBERG 5
  THOMAS DRAKE WILLIAMS 15
  MARY ANNE CONNELL 10

775
CAF 19-00907

RANDOLPH GORSKI
    V
RICHARD PHALEN

Custody

TO BE ARGUED WITH #774

776
CAF 19-00178

KC B. MENCH
    V
RONALD G. MAJERUS, III

Custody

     MICHAEL G. CIANFARANO SUB
  CASEY EDMUND JORDAN 10

777
CAF 19-00998

IN THE MATTER OF
CAMERON M.

Neglect

     CAROL LYNN EISENMAN SUB
     JAMES A. HOBBS SUB
  PAUL B. WATKINS 10

778
CAF 19-00287

KIMBERLY CHATT
    V
JUSTIN T. ALLEN

Custody

  PAUL B. WATKINS 10
  DAVID M. ROACH 10
  ALISON CHRISTINE BATES 10

779
CA 19-02256

ANDREA L. HENDERSHOT
    V
PAUL S. HENDERSHOT

Divorce

  MICHAEL STEINBERG 10
  ANDREA L. HENDERSHOT 10
  SUSAN GRAY 5

780
CA 19-00913

CHARLES EBERHARDT
    V
G&J CONTRACTING, INC.

Dismiss Complaint

  ANNE M. WHEELER 10
  JESSE B. BALDWIN 15

781
CA 20-00017

ANNA L. AMOS
    V
SCHOOL 16 ASSOCIATES, L.P.

Summary Judgment

  KEITH N. BOND 10
  GREGORY V. PAJAK 10

782
CA 19-01839

DIANE M. GRAVES
    V
DAVID B. LILLIE, M.D.

Discovery

  JENNIFER L. FAY 15
  JOHN TIMOTHY LOSS 10

783
CA 20-00216

LYUBOV KLEPANCHUK
    V
STATE OF NEW YORK DOT

Summary Judgment

  K. JOHN WRIGHT 15
  JONATHAN D. HITSOUS 10

784
CA 19-01516

SADIE GARNER
    V
ROSA COPLON JEWISH HOME

Summary Judgment

  ANGELO S. GAMBINO 10
  MEGHANN N. ROEHL 15

785
CA 19-01524

SADIE GARNER
    V
ROSA COPLON JEWISH HOME

Summary Judgment

TO BE ARGUED WITH #784

786
CA 19-02188

CHARLES EBERHARDT
    V
G&J CONTRACTING, INC.

Summary Judgment

  ANNE M. WHEELER 10
  TIMOTHY P. WELCH 15

787
CA 19-00070

KELLY ZUZZE
    V
BRYAN N. BUTLER, M.D.

Summary Judgment

  J. MICHAEL HAYES 10
  JOHN TIMOTHY LOSS 10

788
CA 19-00293

KELLY ZUZZE
    V
BRYAN N. BUTLER, M.D.

Malpractice

TO BE ARGUED WITH #787

789
CA 19-01321

KELLY ZUZZE
    V
BRYAN N. BUTLER, M.D.

Malpractice

TO BE ARGUED WITH #787

790
CA 19-00939

ROBERT C. WILLIAMS
    V
RIDGE VIEW MANOR, LLC

Negligence

     ANGELA THOMPSON-TINSLEY SUB
  MICHAEL C. SCINTA 15

791
CA 20-00068

ROBERT C. WILLIAMS, JR.
    V
RIDGE VIEW MANOR, LLC

Set Aside Verdict

TO BE ARGUED WITH #790

792
CA 20-00533

DOROTHY REAMES
    V
STATE OF NEW YORK

Wrongful Death

  W. BRADLEY HUNT 15
  JONATHAN D. HITSOUS 10

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.