CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of
Murder
RYAN J. MULDOON | SUB |
Murder
KATHLEEN P. REARDON | 10 | |
SCOTT MYLES | 10 |
Conspiracy
CPL art 440
Assault
MATTHEW B. POWERS | 5 | |
ALAN WILLIAMS | 5 |
Attempted Murder
PAUL J. CONNOLLY | 10 | |
BRADLEY W. OASTLER | 10 |
CPL art 440
CHARLES D. STEINMAN | 10 | |
SCOTT MYLES | 10 |
Custody
DEBORAH J. SCINTA | 5 | |
EMILY A. VELLA | 10 |
Family Offense
Paternity
LYLE T. HAJDU | 5 | |
RAYMOND PETER KOT, II | 5 | |
DAVID J. PAJAK | 5 |
Visitation
Visitation
DEBORAH J. SCINTA | 5 | |
JENNIFER M. LORENZ | 15 | |
AUDREY ROSE HERMAN | 10 |
Visitation
LYLE T. HAJDU | 10 | |
MICHAEL A BENSON | 10 | |
EMILY A. VELLA | 10 |
Custody
TYSON BLUE | 10 | |
CHRISTINE F. REDFIELD | 10 |
Summary Judgment
EDWARD JAY SHEATS | 10 | |
DANIEL A. TESTA, III | 15 |
Summary Judgment
MICHAEL E. ROTHENBERG | 15 | |
KENNETH E. ALDOUS | 15 |
Notice of Claim
Dismiss Cause of Action
WILLIAM J. BRENNAN | 10 | |
DANIEL W. ISAACS | 20 |
Summary Judgment
TIFFANY L. D'ANGELO | 15 | |
VINCENT T. PARLATO | 10 |
Severance
New Trial
KENNETH E. ALDOUS | 15 | |
DAVID A. ROTHENBERG | 15 |
Summary Judgment
JAMES L. LUTFY | 15 | |
LISA M. ROBINSON | 15 | |
ROBERT A. ROSENFELD | 15 |
Summary Judgment
ANDREW CONNELLY | 10 | |
ROBERT A. CRAWFORD, JR. | 15 | |
JODY E. BRIANDI | 10 |
Summary Judgment
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.