Wed Sep 04 Arguments
Hon. Samuel L. Green Courtroom
THE COURT WILL BEGIN CALLING CASES AT 10:00 AM IF YOU ARE NOT PRESENT WHEN YOUR CASE IS CALLED YOUR ARGUMENT WILL BE DEEMED SUBMITTED.
Remote Argument Protocols
Parties scheduled to argue must complete the email registration form using the code provided by the Clerk's office. Approximately two hours prior to the start of the argument session you will receive an email to check-in for remote arguments. More details here...
In-Person COVID-19 Argument Protocols
571
KA 21-01517
PEOPLE
V
JARELD BAILEY
Robbery
| SUSAN R. HUTCHISON | SUB | |
| MICHAEL J. HILLERY | SUB |
572
KA 22-00441
PEOPLE
V
STEVEN MCKNIGHT
Attempted Robbery
| ERIN A. TRESMOND | SUB | |
| JERRY MARTI | SUB |
573
KA 21-01583
PEOPLE
V
LASHAWN MILLER-HENDERSON
Criminal Possession Controlled Substance
| CLEA WEISS | 10 |
574
KA 18-01292
PEOPLE
V
JAMEL J. FORSYTHE
Attempted Murder
| JESSICA CLEVER PITTS CUNNINGHAM | SUB | |
| DAWN CATERA LUPI | SUB |
575
KA 22-01635
PEOPLE
V
WILLIAM L HUFNAGLE
Sexual Abuse
| BRADLEY E. KEEM | 10 | |
| AMY LEIGH HALLENBECK | 5 |
576
KA 23-01447
PEOPLE
V
CHASE WALKER
Dismiss Indictment
| DANIEL J. PUNCH | 10 |
577
KA 23-01056
PEOPLE
V
PHILLIP DONDORFER
Aggravated D.W.I.
| DANA RENEE POOLE | 10 | |
| FARES A. RUMI | 10 |
578
CAF 23-00269
IN THE MATTER OF
KIARA F.
Terminate Parental Rights
| THOMAS L. PELYCH | SUB | |
| LISA A. BOWMAN | SUB | |
| CYNTHIA B. BRENNAN | SUB |
579
CAF 23-00508
ASPEN RIDALL
V
BRYANT JONES
Custody
| CARA A. WALDMAN | 10 |
580
CAF 22-01976
IN THE MATTER OF
EVA'LYN F.
Terminate Parental Rights
| VERONICA L. REED | SUB | |
| THOMAS L. PELYCH | SUB | |
| LISA A. BOWMAN | SUB | |
| CYNTHIA B. BRENNAN | SUB |
581
CAF 23-00913
MARSONA B. DAVIS
V
ARCIDES DIEGUEZ CASTILLO
Family Offense
| ALISON CHRISTINE BATES | SUB |
582
CA 23-01169
IN THE MATTER OF
BLOSSOM V.
Mental Hygiene Law
| JOSEPH BETAR | 10 | |
| ROBERT W. CONNOLLY | 10 |
583
CA 23-01736
IN THE MATTER OF
BLOSSOM V.
Mental Hygiene Law
TO BE ARGUED WITH #582
584
CA 23-01544
JACKIE MYLAR
V
NIAGARA FALLS MEMORIAL MEDICAL
Summary Judgment
| MELISSA L. ZITTEL | 15 |
585
CA 23-00890
PATRICK CAPPOLA
V
TENNYSON COURT
Dismiss Claims
| HEDWIG M. AULETTA | 10 | |
| THERESA M. WALSH | 15 |
586
CA 24-00098
PATRICK CAPPOLA
V
TENNYSON COURT
Dismiss Claims
TO BE ARGUED WITH #585
587
CA 24-00229
CATHERINE TAMBINI
V
STATE OF NEW YORK
Summary Judgment
| PHILIP MICHAEL HINES | 15 | |
| OWEN DEMUTH | 10 |
588
CA 23-01650
WILLIAM SHRUBSALL
V
ANTHONY ANNUCCI
CPLR art 78
| LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI | SUB |
589
CA 23-01329
KEITH BALLARD
V
300 EASTERN BLVD. CANANDAIGUA, LLC
Summary Judgment
| COLIN JACOB LAREAUX | 15 | |
| MICHAEL J. CHMIEL | 15 |
590
CA 23-01595
BUFFALO TEACHERS FEDERATION
V
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Arbitration
| JOSE LUIS MANJARREZ | 15 | |
| ROBERT E. QUINN | 15 |
591
CA 23-01673
MATTER OF WAYNE SPENCE (STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK)
Arbitration
| JONATHAN D. HITSOUS | 10 | |
| EDWARD JOSEPH GREENE, JR. | 15 |
592
CA 23-00928
MARIA FERNAND ASTIZ, PH.D.
V
CANISIUS COLLEGE
Summary Judgment
| JENNIFER MORGAN LEVY | 15 |
Calendars are Subject to Change
The calendars published here are for informational purposes only. The calendars are updated frequently but not immediately and may not reflect the status of each case posted.
Please contact the calendar department for the most current information if you have a question about the status of a case.
ACCESSIBILITY
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
Hearing Assistance
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.
