Remote Argument Protocols

Parties scheduled to argue must complete the email registration form using the code provided by the Clerk's office. Approximately two hours prior to the start of the argument session you will receive an email to check-in for remote arguments. More details here...

In-Person COVID-19 Argument Protocols

Pursuant to directives from the Office of Court Administration in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, all visitors to the courthouse... Expand »

400
KA 21-01064

PEOPLE
    V
IVAN GILBERT

Sentence

     ERIN A. TRESMOND SUB
     MICHAEL JOHN MCHALE SUB

401
KA 21-00658

PEOPLE
    V
ALLEN KAZMIERCZAK

Murder

     AXELLE THERESE SOLANGE LECOMTE-MATHEWSON SUB
     MICHAEL J. HILLERY SUB

402
KA 23-00651

PEOPLE
    V
DAVONTE S. BARBER

Robbery

     KATHLEEN P. REARDON 5
     NANCY GILLIGAN 5

403
KA 21-01028

PEOPLE
    V
ZAKKEE NAFI

Sentence

     NICHOLAS P. DIFONZO SUB
     HARMONY A. HEALY SUB

404
KA 19-01406

PEOPLE
    V
TYRONE L. LONG

Driving While Intoxicated

     JANE I. YOON 5
     BRIDGET L. FIELD 5

405
KA 23-00738

PEOPLE
    V
JESSE COLEY

CPL art 440

     ZOETH MCMAHON FLEGENHEIMER 10
     MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 10

406
KA 22-01450

PEOPLE
    V
JUSTIN M. TILLMON

Assault

     THOMAS L. PELYCH 10
     SUSAN C. AZZARELLI SUB

407
CAF 22-01977

IN THE MATTER OF
KIARA F.

Terminate Parental Rights

     VERONICA L. REED SUB
     LISA A. BOWMAN SUB
     CYNTHIA B. BRENNAN SUB

408
CAF 23-01048

DELBERT W. HARGIS, JR.
    V
VICTORIA A. PRITTY-PITCHER

Habeas Corpus

     JOHN A. CIRANDO 15

409
CAF 23-01761

JOSEPH W. DONOHUE
    V
CHRISTIE M. KATERLE

Support

     GARY MULDOON 15
     EMANUEL N. MOUGANIS 10

410
CAF 23-00545

MEGHAN O. MURIEL
    V
JUAN L. MURIEL

Visitation

     GARY MULDOON 10
     JUAN L. MURIEL SUB
     MARYBETH D. BARNET 5

411
CAF 23-01371

ROSHEADA DAVIS
    V
ARDEN MARSHALL

Order of Protection

     MAURICE J. VERILLO 20

412
CAF 22-01978

IN THE MATTER OF
STEVEN S.

Terminate Parental Rights

     VERONICA L. REED SUB
     LISA A. BOWMAN SUB
     CYNTHIA B. BRENNAN SUB

413
CA 23-01734

DION DEFEDERICIS
    V
VINCE'S PIZZA PLUS, INC.

Default Judgment

     F. BRENDAN BURKE, JR. 15
     BRITTANYLEE PENBERTHY 15

414
CA 23-00912

RESIDE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
    V
BRENDON CLAR

Default Judgment

     ERIC M. DOLAN 15
     JOHN A. CIRANDO 15

415
CA 23-01146

GRETCHEN REVERE
    V
ROBERT P. BURKE, D.O.

Set Aside Verdict

     C. TAYLOR PAYNE 15
     ROBERT F. JULIAN 15

416
CA 23-00966

JOSHUA R. DOORES
    V
JILLIAN M. DOORES

Divorce

     MAUREEN A. PINEAU 15
     JOSHUA R. DOORES 15

417
CA 23-01219

KAMAR BOATMAN
    V
COUNTY OF ONONDAGA

Dismiss Complaint

     CAITLIN ANNE ROBIN SUB
     JOHN A. SICKINGER 15

418
CA 23-01891

ROBERT BLIZNIAK
    V
FENCES BY PRECISION, LLC

Dismiss Complaint

     JAMES GRABER 10
     JOHN BRIAN SURGALLA 10

419
CA 23-00179

FRESH AIR FOR THE EASTSIDE, INC.
    V
STATE OF NEW YORK

Dismiss Complaint

     BRIAN MURAY LUSIGNAN 10
     BRIAN DAVID GINSBERG 15
     JOSHUA A. LIEBMAN 10
     ALAN J. KNAUF 20

Calendars are Subject to Change

The calendars published here are for informational purposes only. The calendars are updated frequently but not immediately and may not reflect the status of each case posted.

Please contact the calendar department for the most current information if you have a question about the status of a case.

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.