Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (James A. Vazzana J.), entered June 5, 2023. The order denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment.
Criminal Possession of a Firearm
Robbery
MARK A. YOUNG | SUB | |
CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA | SUB |
Sentence
JANE I. YOON | SUB | |
LISA GRAY | SUB |
Criminal Possession Controlled Substance
CLEA WEISS | 5 | |
LISA GRAY | 5 |
Sex Offender Registration Act
ALEXANDRIA ELIZABETH HAMANN | 15 | |
MICHAEL JOHN PISKO | 15 |
Assault
Driving While Ability Impaired
JAMES ECKERT | SUB | |
LISA GRAY | SUB |
Neglect
Custody
DALTON COSTA LIMA VIEIRA, III | SUB | |
LYLE T. HAJDU | SUB | |
BRIAN P. DEGNAN | 5 |
Neglect
MARY M. WHITESIDE | 5 | |
ALLISON B. CARROW | SUB | |
WILLIAM D. BRODERICK, JR. | 10 | |
MINDY LYNN MARRANCA | 5 | |
DAVID J. PAJAK | 5 |
Dismiss Complaint
MICHAEL P. SULLIVAN | 15 | |
DAVID MICHAEL FULVIO | 15 |
Summary Judgment
Dismiss Claim
Summary Judgment
MICHAEL J. SKONEY | 10 | |
JONATHAN ERIC HANSEN | 15 | |
PIERRE A. VINCENT | SUB |
CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of
Summary Judgment
Summary Judgment
Original Proceeding Pursuant to CPLR art 78
HARMONY A. HEALY | SUB | |
PAUL GORDON DELL | SUB |
Summary Judgment
KARL ZACHARY DEUBLE | 15 | |
CRAIG D. CHARTIER | 15 |
CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of
Dismiss Affirmative Defense
MATTHEW J. KAISER | 15 | |
DARIENN P. BALIN | 15 |
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.