CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of
ARYEH LEIB KAUFMAN | SUB | |
SARAH L. ROSENBLUTH | SUB |
Robbery
DAVID P. ELKOVITCH | SUB | |
CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA | SUB |
Sex Offender Registration Act
TIMOTHY S. DAVIS | SUB | |
NANCY GILLIGAN | SUB |
Robbery
BRADLEY E. KEEM | SUB | |
MATTHEW J. BELL | SUB |
Sex Offender Registration Act
KRISTEN N. MCDERMOTT | SUB | |
ELISABETH DANNAN | SUB |
Criminal Sexual Act
NICHOLAS A. PASSALACQUA | SUB | |
DAWN CATERA LUPI | SUB |
Visitation
TARA J. MELISH | 10 | |
JEFFREY J. RINNE | 10 | |
MICHELE A. BROWN | 5 |
Visitation
Abuse
Terminate Parental Rights
THOMAS R. BABILON | 10 | |
ERIN WELCH FAIR | SUB | |
SUSAN B. MARRIS | 5 |
Summary Judgment
HUGH M. RUSS, III | 15 | |
KELLY J. PHILIPS | 15 | |
MARK E. GUGLIELMI | 15 |
Amend Answer
NICHOLAS ROSSI | 15 | |
EDWARD J. MARKARIAN | 15 |
CPLR art 78
LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI | SUB | |
FRANK BRADY | SUB |
Summary Judgment
MARC C. PANEPINTO | 15 | |
RICHARD JAMES MONTES | 15 |
Damages
AIMEE LAFEVER KOCH | 10 | |
MICHAEL COBBS | 10 |
Contempt
JAMES C. ROSCETTI | SUB | |
KEVIN TODD STOCKER | SUB |
Reargument/Renewal
LEE ALCOTT | 15 | |
JOSEPH J. HEATH | 15 |
Reargument/Renewal
LEE ALCOTT | 15 | |
ERIK A. GOERGEN | 15 |
Jurisdiction
ERIK A. GOERGEN | 15 | |
LEE ALCOTT | 15 |
Jurisdiction
ERIK A. GOERGEN | 15 | |
LEE ALCOTT | 15 |
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.