1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
January Term

Wed Jan 17 Argument #100

CAF 22-01996

BILLY RON ADAMS, JR.
    V
STEPHEN R. JOHN

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Ontario County (Frederick G. Reed, J.), entered on December 7, 2022 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, adjudged that primary physical placement of the subject child shall be with petitioners.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

91
KA 19-00961

PEOPLE
    V
JAMOL M. JACKSON

Murder

     ANDREW G. MORABITO SUB
  MERIDETH H. SMITH SUB

92
KA 22-01866

PEOPLE
    V
LUIS ACOSTA

Sex Offender Registration Act

     TIMOTHY S. DAVIS SUB
  NANCY GILLIGAN SUB

93
KA 23-00479

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
STEVEN MANCUSO

Criminal Possession Weapon

  KENNETH H. TYLER, JR. 10
  DAWN CATERA LUPI 15

94
KA 20-00918

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
TAJMIER M. MACK

Attempted Burglary

  DAVID R. JUERGENS 10
  LISA GRAY 10

95
KA 18-01371

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
DONTEY L. LATHROP

Attempted Murder

  JONATHAN FREDERIC GARVIN 10
  NANCY GILLIGAN 10

96
KA 20-01193

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
LONNIE TOWNSEND

Criminal Possession Weapon

  CLEA WEISS 10
  MERIDETH H. SMITH 10

97
KA 19-02252

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
MELVIN JENKINS

Burglary

  TONYA JEAN PLANK 10
  MERIDETH H. SMITH 10

98
CA 23-01126

PLAY

KEY EQUITY OF NEW YORK, INC.
    V
AHMED AZZAM

Summary Judgment

  MICHAEL JON LONGSTREET 15
  MICHAEL J. KAWA 10

99
CAF 22-01920

PLAY

TRICIA A. CHAPPELL
    V
SAUL HERNANDEZ

Adoption

     VERONICA L. REED SUB
  REBECCA L. KONST 15
  MARYBETH D. BARNET 5

100
CAF 22-01996

PLAY

BILLY RON ADAMS, JR.
    V
STEPHEN R. JOHN

Custody

  KENNETH H. TYLER, JR. 10
  ALISON CHRISTINE BATES SUB

101
CAF 22-01963

PLAY

ROBERT HUGHES
    V
CHRISTIE COPES

Custody

  REBECCA L. KONST 15
  THOMAS MANNING LEITH 15
     MICHAEL J. KERWIN SUB

102
CAF 23-01530

PLAY

ROBERT HUGHES
    V
CHRISTIE COPES

Custody

103
CA 23-00367

PLAY

MICHAEL FREITAS
    V
IMRAN AHMED

Summary Judgment

  ROBERT J. MARANTO, JR. 15
  BRENT MATTHEW REITTER 15

104
CA 23-00206

PLAY

NIKHIL PATEL, M.D.
    V
SADASHIV S. SHENOY, M.D.

Reargument

  ROBERT P. YAWMAN, III 15
  MATTHEW JOHN GARVEY 15

105
CAF 22-01924

PLAY

TRICIA A. CHAPPELL
    V
SAUL HERNANDEZ

Adoption

     VERONICA L. REED SUB
  REBECCA L. KONST 15
  MARYBETH D. BARNET 5

106
CA 23-00271

PLAY

COREEN N. THOMPSON
    V
THOMAS PETERS

Preclusion

  MATTHEW J. BIRD 10
  WILLIAM F. SAVINO 15

107
CA 23-00704

PLAY

AUBREY CONTI
    V
AUBURN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL

Dismiss Complaint

  ADAM P. MASTROLEO 15
  DYLAN WILEY 15

108
CA 23-00885

PLAY

IMADEH NOSEGBE
    V
GERMAIN JEAN CHARLES

Dismiss Complaint

  IMADEH NOSEGBE 15
  BRENDAN MATTHEWS PALFREYMAN 15

109
CA 23-00597

PATRICK KALETA
    V
ASHLEY KALETA

Custody

OVER THE TERM

110
CA 23-00929

BRANDON EVANS
    V
ANTHONY ANNUCCI

CPLR art 78

     NORMAN P. EFFMAN SUB
     KEVIN C. HU SUB

111
CA 23-00636

ESTATE OF WILLIAM A. BEARD

Probate

     DAVID W. HERKALA SUB
     TERRI CONTI YORK SUB
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.