Appeal from a memorandum decision and order of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (James P. McClusky, J.), entered October 25, 2022. The memorandum decision and order granted the motion of respondent for an anonymous caption.
Sex Trafficking
RYAN J. MULDOON | SUB | |
MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II | SUB |
Robbery
Predatory Sexual Assault Against a Child
BRADLEY E. KEEM | 10 | |
ELISABETH DANNAN | 10 |
Criminal Possession Weapon
ALLISON VIOLET MCMAHON | 10 | |
HARMONY A. HEALY | SUB |
Attempted Robbery
SUSAN R HUTCHISON | 10 | |
DANIEL JAMES MATTLE | 5 |
Terminate Parental Rights
VERONICA L. REED | SUB | |
BRIAN P. DEGNAN | SUB | |
CHARLES J. PLOVANICH | SUB |
Neglect
KATHLEEN E. CASEY | SUB | |
KRISTOPHER STEVENS | SUB |
CPLR art 78
CHARLES D. GRIECO | 15 | |
MATTHEW SIMMONDS | 15 |
Damages
CAITLIN ANNE ROBIN | SUB | |
PETER M. KOOSHOIAN | 15 |
Summary Judgment
JOHN A. COLLINS | 10 | |
JILL LYNN CASSERT | SUB |
Mental Hygiene Law
MAURICE JOSEPH VERRILLO | 20 | |
FRANK BRADY | 10 |
Mental Hygiene Law
TERENCE MICHAEL BRENNEN | 15 | |
DAVID A. EGHIGIAN | 10 |
Mental Hygiene Law
TODD G. MONAHAN | SUB | |
BRIAN MURAY LUSIGNAN | 5 |
Summary Judgment
NICHOLAS HURZELER | 15 | |
JOHN KERBY WRIGHT | 5 |
Summary Judgment
ROBERT L. VOLTZ | 15 | |
ALAN J. DEPETERS | 15 |
Default Judgment
R. ANTHONY RUPP, III | 15 | |
THOMAS S. LANE | 15 |
Election Law
PETER A. REESE | 10 | |
JEREMY C. TOTH | 15 | |
JOSEPH T. BURNS | SUB |
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.