1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
October Term

Thu Oct 19 Argument #830

CA 22-01724

JOHN PM DOE
    V
BARBARA HOUK

Appeal from a decision and order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Jeffrey A. Tait, J.), entered September 28, 2022. The decision and order denied the motion of defendant Barbara Houk for summary judgment.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

813
KA 20-01088

PEOPLE
    V
SHANE T. JONES, JR.

Manslaughter

     CLEA WEISS SUB
     SCOTT MYLES SUB

814
KA 22-00405

PEOPLE
    V
PAUL B. BOVEE

Menacing of a Peace Officer

     RYAN J. MULDOON SUB
     CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA SUB

815
KA 22-00968

PEOPLE
    V
DEREK E. CLARK

Aggravated Vehicular Manslaughter

     THOMAS L. PELYCH SUB
     JOHN C. TUNNEY SUB

816
KA 21-01445

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JIMA BROWN

Rape

  NATHANIEL V. RILEY 10
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

817
KA 21-01067

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
RAYMOND F. NEWTON

Burglary

  STEPHANIE R. DIGIORGIO 10
  MATTHEW J. BELL 10

818
KA 20-00312

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
AUGUSTIN OCASIO

Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

  TONYA JEAN PLANK 10
  LISA GRAY 10

819
KA 17-01665

PEOPLE
    V
CALVIN L. PARNELL, JR.

Criminal Possession Weapon

     ANDREW G. MORABITO SUB
     MERIDETH H. SMITH SUB

820
CAF 22-01641

PLAY

SANDY B. MARTIN
    V
GARY J. MARTIN

Custody

  KELIANN M. ARGY 5
  JOHN A. CIRANDO 15

821
CAF 22-01285

PLAY

TARA J. MELISH
    V
JEFFREY J. RINNE

Custody

     TARA J. MELISH SUB
  MICHELE A. BROWN 5

822
CAF 22-01286

PLAY

TARA J. MELISH
    V
JEFFREY J. RINNE

Custody

823
CAF 22-01287

PLAY

TARA J. MELISH
    V
JEFFREY J. RINNE

Custody

824
CAF 22-00842

PLAY

TREVOR D. CASTLE
    V
STEPHANI M. BARNES

Custody

     VERONICA L. REED SUB
     DAVID J. PAJAK SUB
  BRIAN P. DEGNAN 10

825
CA 22-01907

PLAY

MIGUEL REYES
    V
EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING GREECE

Summary Judgment

  TIMOTHY C. BELLAVIA 15
  JAMES PATRICK MILBRAND 15
     L. DAMIEN COSTANZA SUB

826
CA 22-01943

PLAY

KENT JEFFREY
    V
THE FAYETTEVILLE-MANLIUS CSD

Summary Judgment

  JOHN A. CIRANDO 15
  ALLISON B. FIUT 15
  DONALD S. DIBENEDETTO 15

827
TP 23-00815

PATRICK SHEVLIN
    V
ANTHONY ANNUCCI

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

     LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI SUB

828
CA 23-00225

KEY EQUITY OF NEW YORK, INC.
    V
AHMED AZZAM

Summary Judgment

OFF THE CALENDAR

829
CA 22-01498

PLAY

JOANNE C. LENTNER
    V
UPSTATE FORESTRY AND DEVELOPMENT

Summary Judgment

  DAVID PETER JOHNSON 15
  DAVID D. BENZ 15
     WILLARD ROGER PRATT, III SUB

831
CA 22-01774

PLAY

PATRICIA ARNOLD
    V
TOWN OF CAMILLUS

Notice of Claim

  ROBERT JAMES STRUM 10
  KSENIYA PREMO 15

832
CA 23-00529

PLAY

TAMMY L. KELLY
    V
NICOLAS J. PROHASKA

Summary Judgment

  JOHN A. COLLINS 15
  JOSEPH ROBERT DARIN 15

833
CA 22-02005

PLAY

DELILAH DESSELLE
    V
DAVID HILLS

Dismiss Complaint

  W. ROBERT TAYLOR 10
  THOMAS JOHNSON 10

834
CA 23-00094

PLAY

LEIGH VAN OSTRAND
    V
PETER LATHAM

Summary Judgment

  GARY MULDOON 15
  MICHAEL STEINBERG 15

830
CA 22-01724

PLAY

JOHN PM DOE
    V
BARBARA HOUK

Summary Judgment

  JENNIFER L. WANG 15
  HUGH DANIEL SANDLER 15
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.