Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Lynn W. Keane, J.), entered July 14, 2022. The judgment, inter alia, equitably distributed the marital property of the parties.
Criminal Contempt
THOMAS L. PELYCH | SUB | |
CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA | SUB |
Sex Offender Registration Act
KENNETH H. TYLER, JR. | SUB | |
BRITTANY GROME ANTONACCI | SUB |
Burglary
CAROLYN ROSE WALTHER | SUB | |
SCOTT MYLES | SUB |
Sex Offender Registration Act
LEAH NANCY FARWELL | SUB | |
V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON | SUB |
Terminate Parental Rights
ROBERT J. GALLAMORE | SUB | |
CATHERINE M. SULLIVAN | 5 |
Neglect
CHARLES J. GREENBERG | 5 | |
REBECCA CRONAN HOFFMAN | 5 | |
MELISSA A. CAVAGNARO | 5 |
Neglect
COURTNEY S. RADICK | 15 | |
JEFFERY G. TOMPKINS | 5 | |
CATHERINE M. SULLIVAN | 5 |
Summary Judgment
LISA M. COMEAU | 15 | |
MARIA T. MASTRIANO | 15 |
Dismiss Complaint
BRIAN D. GINSBERG | 15 | |
ANDREA NICOLE CONJERTI | 15 |
Summary Judgment
JAMES M. SPECYAL | 15 | |
MARC A. SCHULZ | 15 |
Summary Judgment
KENNETH A. KRAJEWSKI | 15 | |
LEONARD D. ZACCAGNINO | 15 |
Eminent Domain
CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of
NORMAN P. EFFMAN | SUB | |
KEVIN C. HU | SUB |
Dismiss Claim
MARY KATHERINE MCCARTHY | 15 | |
FRANK BRADY | 10 |
Malpractice
CHARLES EARL PATTON | 5 | |
MARY ELIZABETH LANGAN | 15 |
CPLR art 78
CORY HAL MORRIS | 15 | |
MAURA C. SEIBOLD | 15 |
CPLR art 78
JAMES M. SPECYAL | 15 | |
DANIEL R. ROSE | 15 |
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.