Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Henry J. Nowak, J.), entered December 30, 2021. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment.
Murder
DREW R. DUBRIN | SUB | |
SCOTT MYLES | SUB |
Sex Offender Registration Act
DAVID J. PAJAK | SUB | |
WILLIAM G. ZICKL | SUB |
Sex Offender Registration Act
DAVID R. JUERGENS | SUB | |
NANCY GILLIGAN | SUB |
Manslaughter
CARA A. WALDMAN | SUB | |
SCOTT MYLES | SUB |
Custody
KATHLEEN E. CASEY | SUB | |
ASHLEY LYON | SUB |
Neglect
THOMAS L. PELYCH | SUB | |
MARY HOPE M BENEDICT | SUB |
Terminate Parental Rights
DAVID J. PAJAK | SUB | |
MICHAEL WERNER | 5 | |
SCOTT A. OTIS | 10 |
CPLR art 78
JONATHAN R. TANTILLO | 15 | |
W. BRADLEY HUNT | 15 | |
KEVIN GREGORY ROE | 10 | |
KATHLEEN M. BENNETT | 15 |
Summary Judgment
JACOB A. PIORKOWSKI | 15 | |
JUSTIN L. HENDRICKS | 15 | |
MEGHAN M. BROWN | 10 |
Support
AZUJHON SIMS | SUB |
Summary Judgment
KATHRYN B. FRIEDMAN | 10 | |
JASON R. DIPASQUALE | 10 | |
MARY ANNE CONNELL | 10 |
Damages
JOHN A. COLLINS | SUB |
Summary Judgment
ANDREW BORELLI | 15 | |
ROBERT F. JULIAN | 15 |
Summary Judgment
NATHAN A. VAN LOON | 15 | |
RICHARD C. BRISTER | 15 |
CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of
ERNESTO DELGADO | SUB | |
KATE H. NEPVEU | SUB |
Summary Judgment
DANIELLE RENEE SMITH | 10 | |
ROBERT H. FLYNN | 10 | |
MARIA T. MASTRIANO | 15 |
Dismiss Complaint
GERALD T. WALSH | 15 | |
GREGORY V. PAJAK | 15 |
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.