Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

170
KA 19-02026

PEOPLE
    V
CONSTANTINE D. MURRELL

Robbery

     JOHN J. MORRISSEY SUB
     WILLIAM G. ZICKL SUB

171
KA 20-01308

PEOPLE
    V
DAVID STREBER, JR.

Criminal Possession Stolen Property

SETTLED

172
KA 20-00290

PEOPLE
    V
ALBERT D. MEE

Burglary

     LEAH NANCY FARWELL SUB
     V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON SUB

173
KA 18-01536

PEOPLE
    V
MARIA J. ACOSTA

Arson

     TIMOTHY S. DAVIS SUB
     SCOTT MYLES SUB

174
KA 19-01415

PEOPLE
    V
CARVIS MCCUTCHEON

Criminal Possession Weapon

  ABIGAIL DOROTHY WHIPPLE 10
  DANIEL JAMES MATTLE 5

175
KA 21-00987

PEOPLE
    V
JEFFREY SWARTZ

Sex Offender Registration Act

     TIMOTHY S. DAVIS SUB
     NANCY GILLIGAN SUB

176
KA 21-00988

PEOPLE
    V
JEFFREY SWARTZ

Sex Offender Registration Act

TO BE ARGUED WITH #175

177
KA 20-01309

PEOPLE
    V
DAVID STREBER, JR.

Promoting Prison Contraband

     BRIDGET L. FIELD SUB

178
CAF 21-01154

STACI R. FAVRET
    V
JEREMY J. FAVRET

Custody

OVER THE TERM

179
CAF 22-00266

IN THE MATTER OF
MILO C.

Neglect

  THOMAS MANNING LEITH SUB
  ERIN WELCH FAIR 10
  ELIZABETH SCHENCK 5

180
CA 21-00995

CHRISTOPHER SMITH
    V
ANNA J. SMITH

Preliminary Injunction

  ANNA J. SMITH 15
  KEVIN G. COPE 15

181
CA 21-01407

CHRISTOPHER SMITH
    V
ANNA J. SMITH

Preliminary Injunction

TO BE ARGUED WITH #180

182
CA 22-00804

XIANLIANG WANG
    V
STEVEN BARBOSA

Contract

     JACK DANZIGER SUB
     DANIEL J. BOBBETT SUB

183
CA 22-01503

SUSAN M. WEICHERT
    V
GREGORY C. HEMMERICH

Contract

     SUSAN M. WEICHERT SUB
     DAVID ANTHONY LONGERETTA SUB

184
OP 22-00885

WILLIAM J. COKE, SR.
    V
NIAGARA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

Original Proceeding Pursuant to CPLR art 78

OVER THE TERM

185
CA 22-00493

CAROL MECCA
    V
ALTERNATIVE LIVING SERVICES-NEW YORK, INC.

Summary Judgment

  MEGHANN N. ROEHL 15
  JESSE A. DRUMM 15

186
CA 22-01272

CAROL MECCA
    V
ALTERNATIVE LIVING SERVICES-NEW YORK, INC.

null

TO BE ARGUED WITH #185

187
CA 21-00874

CHRISTOPHER SMITH
    V
THEODORE P. SMITH INCOME ONLY IRREVOCABLE TRUST

Preliminary Injunction

  ANNA J. SMITH 15
  KEVIN G. COPE 15

188
CA 22-00289

BARBARA HART
    V
CITY OF BUFFALO

Summary Judgment

  JOHN A. COLLINS 10
  ERIN E. MOLISANI 15

189
CA 22-01130

CHRISTINE CASTIGLIONE
    V
JAN PISANCZYN

Dismiss Complaint

  HILARY C. BANKER 10
  FRANK M. BOGULSKI 5

190
CA 21-00131

MORGAN JAMIE DUNBAR
    V
WOMEN & CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO

Dismiss Complaint

  MORGAN JAMIE DUNBAR 15
     KIMBERLY A. CLINE SUB
  MOLLIE C. MCGORRY 15
  NEAL A. JOHNSON 15

191
CA 22-01713

MORGAN JAMIE DUNBAR
    V
WOMEN & CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO

Dismiss Complaint

TO BE ARGUED WITH #190

192
CA 21-00904

MORGAN JAMIE DUNBAR
    V
WOMEN & CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO

Settle Record

TO BE ARGUED WITH #190

193
CA 22-00657

MARY HAAS
    V
TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA

Summary Judgment

  DAVID J. WOLFF, JR. 15
  JOSEPH G. MAKOWSKI 15

194
CA 22-01164

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF BUFFALO/ NIAGARA INC.
    V
ERIE CANAL HARBOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

CPLR art 78

  RICHARD J. LIPPES 15
  DANIEL A. SPITZER 15
  CARIN S. GORDON 15

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.