1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
November Term

Mon Dec 05 Argument #1011

CA 21-01367

WILLIAM DALY
    V
ANTHONY J. COSTELLO GROUP, LLC

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, N.), entered July 27, 2021. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment on liability against defendants Anthony J. Costello & Son Development, LLC, and Anthony J. Costello & Son (Joseph) Development, LLC.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

997
KA 18-01757

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
EZRA BELL

Violation of Probation

  SHIRLEY A. GORMAN 10
  NANCY GILLIGAN 10

998
KA 16-02353

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
DAVID S. ALCARAZ-UBILES

Assault

  DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR. 10
  MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 10

999
KA 22-00093

PEOPLE
    V
DEON ANDERSON

Sentence

     CAITLIN M. CONNELLY SUB
     KAITLYN M. GUPTILL SUB

1000
KA 20-00399

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
CHARLES J. DEAN, JR.

Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

  DREW R. DUBRIN 10
  LISA GRAY 10

1001
KA 21-01032

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JOSHUA L. REEDY

Driving While Intoxicated

  CRAIG M. CORDES 10
     JOHN C. TUNNEY SUB

1002
KA 19-00797

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
LEON G. ROACH

Assault

  CAROLYN ROSE WALTHER 10
  MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 10

1003
KA 19-00979

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
MIGUEL PARILLA

Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

  ROBERT L. KEMP 10
  JERRY MARTI 10

1004
KA 19-00350

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
AMBER L. WESTBROOKS

Assault

  JANET C. SOMES 5
  LISA GRAY 5

1005
KA 18-00445

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
BRANDON THORNTON

Murder

  DAVID R. JUERGENS 10
  KAYLAN C. PORTER 10

1006
CAF 21-00777

PLAY

PATRICK A. KOCH
    V
SARA L. GORECKI

Custody

  SUJATA RAMAIAH 10
  BARBARA A. KILBRIDGE 10
  SARAH LOUISE FIFIELD 10

1007
CAF 21-01667

PLAY

JOANNE C. SMITH
    V
DANIEL L. BALDWIN

Custody

  STEPHANIE R. DIGIORGIO 10
  SUSAN B. MARRIS 10

1009
TP 22-01056

JAMES R. CHARTRAND
    V
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

     JOHN G. LEONARD SUB
     FRANK BRADY SUB

1010
CA 22-00025

PLAY

DARLENE CONNORS
    V
COUNTY OF ERIE

Dismiss Complaint

  AMANDA MARIE HOWELL SOMMA 15
     ANDREW T. GILL SUB

1011
CA 21-01367

PLAY

WILLIAM DALY
    V
ANTHONY J. COSTELLO GROUP, LLC

Summary Judgment

  CURTIS ALAN JOHNSON 15
  RYAN THOMAS BIESENBACH 15

1012
CA 22-00010

GARDEN VILLAGE APARTMENTS, LLC
    V
CSC SERVICEWORKS, INC.

Dismiss Complaint

SETTLED

1013
CA 21-01454

PLAY

NICHOLAS T.
    V
TOWN OF TONAWANDA

Dismiss Complaint

  JILL WNEK 10
  JOSEPH H. EMMINGER, JR. 10
     STEPHEN MATTHEW SORRELS SUB

1014
CA 21-01798

STATE OF NEW YORK
    V
R.T.

Mental Hygiene Law

     TODD G. MONAHAN SUB
     KATHLEEN M. TREASURE SUB

1015
CA 21-01223

PLAY

PB-36 DOE
    V
NIAGARA FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Dismiss Claims

  JONATHAN PETER SHAUB 15
     SCOTT ADAM CHESIN SUB
  ALEXANDRIA TWINEM 10
  YITZCHAK MEIR FOGEL 15

1008
CA 21-01512

PLAY

FIELDS ENTERPRISES INC.
    V
BRISTOL HARBOUR VILLAGE ASSOCIATION

Summary Judgment

  ALAN J. KNAUF 15
  MATTHEW C. LENAHAN 15
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.