Attempted Aggravated Assault
DAVID R. JUERGENS | SUB | |
NANCY GILLIGAN | SUB |
Attempted Burglary
ERIN A. KULESUS | SUB | |
DANIELLE E. PHILLIPS | SUB |
Murder
BRIAN SHIFFRIN | 10 | |
LEAH R. MERVINE | 10 |
Violation of Probation
HELEN SYME | 10 | |
NANCY GILLIGAN | 10 |
Habeas Corpus
CHARLES A. MARANGOLA | SUB | |
PATRICK A. WOODS | SUB |
Criminal Possession Weapon
EFTIHIA BOURTIS | SUB | |
DEREK HARNSBERGER | SUB |
Attempted Assault
BRADLEY E. KEEM | 10 | |
JOSHUA J. TONRA | 10 |
Vacate Judgment
DANIEL R. ROSE | 10 | |
GREGORY V. PAJAK | 10 |
Summary Judgment
ELISE L. CASSAR | 15 | |
JOSEPH D. MORATH, JR. | 15 |
Summary Judgment
JAMES H. COSGRIFF, III | 15 | |
ERIC M. SHELTON | 15 |
Summary Judgment
GREGORY V. PAJAK | 10 | |
VALERIE L. BARBIC | 10 |
Negligence
Dismiss Complaint
J. MICHAEL LENNON | 15 | |
JUSTIN S. WHITE | 15 |
Summary Judgment
JEREMY C. TOTH | 15 | |
DANIEL J. CHIACCHIA | 15 |
Reargument
Summary Judgment
JOHN A. COLLINS | 10 | |
BRENT C. SEYMOUR | 15 |
Amend Complaint
MAEVE E. HUGGINS | 15 | |
JEANNE M. VINAL | 10 |
Summary Judgment
ELIZABETH ANN HOLMES | 10 | |
JAMES P. BLENK | 15 |
Summary Judgment
PATRICIA GILLEN | SUB |
CPLR art 78
ARNOLD R. PETRALIA | 15 | |
BEEZLY KIERNAN | 10 |
Summary Judgment
TIFFANY L. D'ANGELO | 15 | |
WAYNE C. FELLE | 15 |
CPLR art 78
FIONA WOLFE | 15 | |
BRIAN D. GINSBERG | 15 | |
MICHAEL P. SCOTT-KRISTANSEN | 15 |
CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.