Remote Argument Protocols

Parties scheduled to argue must complete the email registration form using the code provided by the Clerk's office. Approximately two hours prior to the start of the argument session you will receive an email to check-in for remote arguments. More details here...

In-Person COVID-19 Argument Protocols

Pursuant to directives from the Office of Court Administration in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, all visitors to the courthouse... Expand »

PEOPLE
    V
MICHAEL ROSS

CPL art 440

  PARKER MACKAY 10
  HARMONY A. HEALY 10

92
KA 16-01444

PEOPLE
    V
STEVE FULCOTT

Criminal Possession Marihuana

     STEVEN A. FELDMAN SUB
     AMY WALENDZIAK SUB

PEOPLE
    V
BENZINO E. REED

Manslaughter

  JAMES A. HOBBS 5
  RYAN ASHE 5

94
KA 22-01938

PEOPLE
    V
JAKWAN CURRY

Criminal Possession Weapon

     DREW R. DUBRIN SUB
     MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II SUB

95
KA 23-02054

PEOPLE
    V
JAKWAN CURRY

Criminal Possession Weapon

TO BE ARGUED WITH #94

PEOPLE
    V
JASON PERRY

Offering False Instrument Filing

  DAVID R. JUERGENS 10
  RYAN PAUL ASHE 10

PEOPLE
    V
DERRICK C. MARSH

Assault

  BHAGYASHREE GUPTE 15
  LORI PETTIT RIEMAN 15

PEOPLE
    V
MARLANDO A. ALLEN

Murder

  FABIENNE NOELLE SANTACROCE 5
  LISA GRAY 10

PEOPLE
    V
SHAWN WRIGHT

Criminal Possession Weapon

  BRADLEY E. KEEM 10
  DAVID DE LA GARZA BASSETT 10

ERICA NICOLE SMITH
    V
BENJAMIN V. BUTLER

Custody

  PARKER MACKAY 10
  MICHAEL JAMES CAPUTO 5

IN THE MATTER OF
MALIAH B.

Neglect

     CHARLES J. GREENBERG SUB
  JULIE VILJOEN 10
  ROXANNA QUINN HERREID 5

IN THE MATTER OF
MODESTY B.

Neglect

TO BE ARGUED WITH #101

IN THE MATTER OF
MCKELL K.

Neglect

TO BE ARGUED WITH #101

TREVOR TORRES
    V
KATRINA A. PFEIFFER

Custody

  ERIC FERRANTE 15
  REBECCA L. KONST 15
  SCOTT A. OTIS 10

105
CA 23-01580

PB-57 DOE
    V
THE LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD

Summary Judgment

OVER THE TERM

105.1
CA 23-01581

PB-57 DOE
    V
THE LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD

Summary Judgment

OVER THE TERM

KENNETH BAKER
    V
STATE OF NEW YORK

Negligence

  MICHAEL E. DALEY 15
  OWEN DEMUTH 10

107
TP 24-01265

CITY OF ROCHESTER
    V
REMINGTON REYES

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

     CHRISTOPHER S. NOONE SUB
     DANIEL DEBOLT SUB

108
CA 24-00237

PETER R. MORGAN
    V
CITY OF UTICA

Summary Judgment

     ZACHARY C. OREN SUB

JACEK WOLOSZUK
    V
WENDE LOGAN-YOUNG, M.D.

Vacate Dismissal

  EDWARD J. MARKARIAN 15
  MARGARET E. SOMERSET 15
  BARBARA D. GOLDBERG 15

IN THE MATTER OF
WENDY COOPER (ROSWELL PARK COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CTR)

Arbitration

  MICHAEL EDWARD HICKEY 15
  JENIFER MARCELLE WHARTON 15

DONALD J. LEONE
    V
ELMWOOD BIDWELL REDEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC

Dismiss Complaint

  JOHN A. COLLINS 15
  JENNIFER PERSICO 15

112
CA 24-00050

AARON CHANG
    V
BILLIE J. COLLINS-WELLS

Guardianship

     SUSAN L. SCHNEIDER SUB

BUFFALO NAVAL PARK COMMITTEE, INC.
    V
WATER QUALITY INSURANCE SYNDICATE

Dismiss Complaint

  JOHN T. KOLAGA 15
  JOHN MAYNARD WOODS 15

Calendars are Subject to Change

The calendars published here are for informational purposes only. The calendars are updated frequently but not immediately and may not reflect the status of each case posted.

Please contact the calendar department for the most current information if you have a question about the status of a case.

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.