Remote Argument Protocols

Parties scheduled to argue must complete the email registration form using the code provided by the Clerk's office. Approximately two hours prior to the start of the argument session you will receive an email to check-in for remote arguments. More details here...

In-Person COVID-19 Argument Protocols

Pursuant to directives from the Office of Court Administration in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, all visitors to the courthouse... Expand »

938
KA 23-00418

PEOPLE
    V
TREVOR D. HARRELL

Predatory Sexual Assault Against a Child

     RYAN J. MULDOON SUB
     MORGAN RILEY MAYER SUB

939
KA 18-01550

PEOPLE
    V
MARQUIS D. COUNCIL

Robbery

     KATHLEEN P. REARDON SUB
     LISA GRAY SUB

940
KA 23-02003

PEOPLE
    V
SHARON M. ANEMAET

Sex Offender Registration Act

     KERRY ANN CONNER SUB
     V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON SUB

941
KA 24-00381

PEOPLE
    V
KAITLYN CONLEY

CPL art 440

     MELISSA SWARTZ 15
     MICHAEL ANTHONY LABELLA, JR. 15

942
KA 18-00756

PEOPLE
    V
MARK DUBLINO

Attempted Murder

OFF THE CALENDAR

943
KA 23-00688

PEOPLE
    V
LATEEF ODUSANYA

Burglary

     BRADLEY E. KEEM 10
     V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON 5

944
KA 21-00741

PEOPLE
    V
THOMAS HOWARD

Robbery

     STEPHANIE M. STARE 10
     AERON SCHWALLIE 10

945
KA 19-00783

PEOPLE
    V
DARRYL PARKER, JR.

Criminal Possession Weapon

     BRIAN SHIFFRIN 5
     MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 5

946
CAF 23-01226

IN THE MATTER OF
ANAVIAS D.

Terminate Parental Rights

     THOMAS L. PELYCH SUB
     DEANA DOMENICA GATTARI 10
     COURTNEY S. RADICK 5

947
CAF 23-01134

MICHELLE L. KING
    V
MICHAEL T. KING, JR.

Custody

     JONATHAN FREDERIC GARVIN 10
     NATHAN A. VAN LOON 15
     MARY HOPE BENEDICT 5

948
CAF 23-02126

GRACE PUCHALSKI
    V
TIMOTHY J. LEMKE

Custody

     JOHN A. CIRANDO 15
     ROBERT E. GENANT 5
     PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR. 5

949
CAF 22-01962

ISHAUNA C. SEVILLA
    V
ROCHELLE TORRES

Custody

     SCOTT GODKIN SUB
     PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR. 5

950
CAF 23-01015

IN THE MATTER OF
SOFIA M.

Abuse

     CHARLES J. GREENBERG 5
     GABRIELLE GANNON 10
     RUSSELL EDWARD FOX 5

951
CAF 23-01227

IN THE MATTER OF
ARIYA D.

Terminate Parental Rights

     THOMAS L. PELYCH SUB
     MARYANGELA SCALZO 10
     COURTNEY S. RADICK 5

952
CA 23-01656

TINA CALVANESO
    V
GENE CALVANESO

Custody

     KELLY A. FERON 15
     A. ANGELO DIMILLO 15
     JASON J. CAFARELLA 5

953
CA 23-01233

SAHAR SHAHMOHAMAD
    V
HOSSEIN SHAHMOHAMAD

Divorce

     RICHARD S. LEVIN SUB

954
CA 24-00042

LETICIA LEE
    V
MICROSOFT CORPORATION

Arbitration

     LETICIA LEE SUB
     JOSE MARIO VALDES 15

955
CA 22-01970

TARA ANGELI-JOHNSON
    V
RAYEES NIZAM, M.D.

Summary Judgment

     GABRIELLE L. BULL 15
     CHARLES L. FALGIATANO 15

956
CAF 23-01228

IN THE MATTER OF
AVALINA D.

Terminate Parental Rights

     THOMAS L. PELYCH SUB
     MARYANGELA SCALZO 10
     COURTNEY S. RADICK 5

957
CA 23-02002

MICHELLE FURLONG
    V
SADASHIV S. SHENOY, M.D.

Severance

     JOHN A. COLLINS 15
     JESSE B. BALDWIN 15

Calendars are Subject to Change

The calendars published here are for informational purposes only. The calendars are updated frequently but not immediately and may not reflect the status of each case posted.

Please contact the calendar department for the most current information if you have a question about the status of a case.

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.