CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of
JAMES A.W. MCLEOD | SUB | |
ALEXANDRIA TWINEM | SUB |
Aggravated Criminal Contempt
SUSAN R. HUTCHISON | SUB | |
MICHAEL J. HILLERY | SUB |
Sentence
SUSAN R. HUTCHISON | SUB | |
MINDY F. VANLEUVAN | SUB |
Sentence
ERIN A. TRESMOND | SUB | |
APRIL J. ORLOWSKI | SUB |
Sexual Abuse
DAVID J. PAJAK | SUB | |
APRIL J. ORLOWSKI | SUB |
Criminal Possession Controlled Substance
DAVID P. ELKOVITCH | SUB | |
CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA | SUB |
Dismiss Indictment
MICHAEL J. HILLERY | 10 | |
ABIGAIL DOROTHY WHIPPLE | 10 |
Criminal Sexual Act
DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR. | 10 | |
RYAN PAUL ASHE | 10 |
Custody
THOMAS L. PELYCH | SUB | |
CAITLIN M. CONNELLY | SUB | |
SCOTT A. OTIS | 10 |
Custody
KELLY FORST | 10 | |
CHARLES D. STEINMAN | 10 | |
DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR. | 10 |
Neglect
DAVID J. PAJAK | SUB | |
JORDYN ELIZABETH SCHENK | 5 |
Visitation
CHARLES J. GREENBERG | 5 | |
DEBORAH K. JESSEY | 5 |
Family Offense
CARA A. WALDMAN | 15 | |
ANDREW JAMES DIPASQUALE | SUB |
Dismiss Complaint
MEGHANN N. ROEHL | 15 | |
JESSE A. DRUMM | 15 |
Dismiss Claims
JAMES P. BLENK | 15 | |
COLIN M. KNOER | 15 |
Dismiss Complaint
TERRENCE J. HOFFMAN | 15 | |
LEE ALCOTT | 15 |
Summary Judgment
JILL RACHEL ROLOFF | 15 | |
KEVIN E. LOFTUS | 15 | |
KRISTIN A. TISCI | 15 |
Mental Hygiene Law
NATHANIEL V. RILEY | 10 | |
BRIAN MURAY LUSIGNAN | 10 |
Foreclosure
M. KIRK OKAY | SUB | |
STEPHEN J. VARGAS | SUB |
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.