1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
May Term

Mon May 20 Argument #409

CAF 23-01761

JOSEPH W. DONOHUE
    V
CHRISTIE M. KATERLE

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Alecia J. Mazzo, J.), entered April 3, 2023 in a proceeding pursuant to to Family Court Act article 4. The order, among other things, denied petitioner's objection to an order of the support magistrate, dated February 10, 2023, which dismissed the petition.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

400
KA 21-01064

PEOPLE
    V
IVAN GILBERT

Sentence

     ERIN A. TRESMOND SUB
     MICHAEL JOHN MCHALE SUB

401
KA 21-00658

PEOPLE
    V
ALLEN KAZMIERCZAK

Murder

     AXELLE THERESE SOLANGE LECOMTE-MATHEWSON SUB
     MICHAEL J. HILLERY SUB

402
KA 23-00651

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
DAVONTE S. BARBER

Robbery

  KATHLEEN P. REARDON 5
  NANCY GILLIGAN 5

403
KA 21-01028

PEOPLE
    V
ZAKKEE NAFI

Sentence

     NICHOLAS P. DIFONZO SUB
     HARMONY A. HEALY SUB

404
KA 19-01406

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
TYRONE L. LONG

Driving While Intoxicated

  JANE I. YOON 5
  MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 5

405
KA 23-00738

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JESSE COLEY

CPL art 440

  ZOETH MCMAHON FLEGENHEIMER 10
  MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 10

406
KA 22-01450

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JUSTIN M. TILLMON

Assault

  THOMAS L. PELYCH 10
     SUSAN C. AZZARELLI SUB

407
CAF 22-01977

IN THE MATTER OF
KIARA F.

Terminate Parental Rights

     VERONICA L. REED SUB
     LISA A. BOWMAN SUB
     CYNTHIA B. BRENNAN SUB

408
CAF 23-01048

PLAY

DELBERT W. HARGIS, JR.
    V
VICTORIA A. PRITTY-PITCHER

Habeas Corpus

  REBECCA L. KONST 15

409
CAF 23-01761

PLAY

JOSEPH W. DONOHUE
    V
CHRISTIE M. KATERLE

Support

  GARY MULDOON 15
  EMANUEL N. MOUGANIS 10

410
CAF 23-00545

PLAY

MEGHAN O. MURIEL
    V
JUAN L. MURIEL

Visitation

  GARY MULDOON 10
     JUAN L. MURIEL SUB
  MARYBETH D. BARNET 5

411
CAF 23-01371

PLAY

ROSHEADA DAVIS
    V
ARDEN MARSHALL

Order of Protection

  LUCY ANDERSON BRADO 20

412
CAF 22-01978

IN THE MATTER OF
STEVEN S.

Terminate Parental Rights

     VERONICA L. REED SUB
     LISA A. BOWMAN SUB
     CYNTHIA B. BRENNAN SUB

413
CA 23-01734

PLAY

DION DEFEDERICIS
    V
VINCE'S PIZZA PLUS, INC.

Default Judgment

  F. BRENDAN BURKE, JR. 15
  BRITTANYLEE PENBERTHY 15

414
CA 23-00912

PLAY

RESIDE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
    V
BRENDON CLAR

Default Judgment

     ERIC M. DOLAN SUB
  JOHN A. CIRANDO 15

415
CA 23-01146

PLAY

GRETCHEN REVERE
    V
ROBERT P. BURKE, D.O.

Set Aside Verdict

  C. TAYLOR PAYNE 15
  ROBERT F. JULIAN 15

416
CA 23-00966

PLAY

JOSHUA R. DOORES
    V
JILLIAN M. DOORES

Divorce

  MAUREEN A. PINEAU 15
  JOSHUA R. DOORES 15

417
CA 23-01219

KAMAR BOATMAN
    V
COUNTY OF ONONDAGA

Dismiss Complaint

     CAITLIN ANNE ROBIN SUB
     JOHN A. SICKINGER SUB

418
CA 23-01891

PLAY

ROBERT BLIZNIAK
    V
FENCES BY PRECISION, LLC

Dismiss Complaint

  ALYSON ROSE TUFILLARO 10
  JOHN BRIAN SURGALLA 10

419
CA 23-00179

PLAY

FRESH AIR FOR THE EASTSIDE, INC.
    V
STATE OF NEW YORK

Dismiss Complaint

  BRIAN MURAY LUSIGNAN 10
  BRIAN DAVID GINSBERG 15
  JOSHUA A. LIEBMAN 10
  ALAN J. KNAUF 20
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.