Appeal from a decision and order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Christopher S. Ciaccio, A.J.), entered January 7, 2022. The decision and order granted the motion of defendant LeChase Construction Services, LLC, for summary judgment and dismissed the verified complaint.
Criminal Sexual Act
ABIGAIL DOROTHY WHIPPLE | SUB | |
MICHAEL J. HILLERY | SUB |
Robbery
ERIN A. TRESMOND | SUB | |
DANIEL J. PUNCH | SUB |
Criminal Possession Weapon
FABIENNE NOELLE SANTACROCE | 5 | |
SCOTT MYLES | 5 |
Criminal Sale Controlled Substance
JONATHAN FREDERIC GARVIN | SUB | |
SCOTT MYLES | SUB |
Sex Offender Registration Act
DAVID R. JUERGENS | SUB | |
NANCY GILLIGAN | SUB |
Custody
MICHAEL STEINBERG | 10 | |
JOSEPH PLUKAS | 15 | |
MAUREEN POLEN | 5 |
Neglect
LYLE T. HAJDU | 10 | |
STEPHEN J. RILEY | 10 | |
MARY ANNE CONNELL | 10 |
Neglect
DAVID J. PAJAK | SUB | |
REBECCA CRONAN HOFFMAN | SUB | |
NATHALIE T. MARIN | 5 |
Summary Judgment
KYLE RITER | 15 | |
JENNIFER M. SCHAUERMAN | 15 |
Summary Judgment
KATE I. REID | 15 | |
JOHN CHERUNDOLO | SUB |
Conversion
RICHARD JAMES MONTES | 15 | |
RYAN K. CUMMINGS | 15 |
Summary Judgment
PETER MCGRATH | SUB | |
JOHN BRIAN SURGALLA | 10 |
CPLR art 78
MICHAEL JOSEPH MANUSIA | SUB | |
SARAH L. ROSENBLUTH | SUB |
Summary Judgment
JAMES HAROLD KIEBURTZ | 15 | |
MATTHEW J. DUGGAN | SUB | |
EDWARD Y. CROSSMORE | 15 |
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.