1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
January Term

Tue Jan 17 Argument #110

CA 22-00430

IN THE MATTER OF
NIAGARA FALLS CAPTAINS AND LIEUTENANTS ASSN AND CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Frank Caruso, J.), entered March 15, 2022. The order denied the verified petition and confirmed an arbitration award.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

91
KA 21-00199

PEOPLE
    V
STEVEN J. ORDWAY

Burglary

     ALLISON VIOLET MCMAHON SUB
     V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON SUB

92
KA 21-01739

PEOPLE
    V
CLARENCE PARKS

Sentence

  PHILIP ROTHSCHILD SUB
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER SUB

93
KA 19-00525

PEOPLE
    V
MICHAEL SCOTT

Attempted Murder

     DREW R. DUBRIN SUB
     SCOTT MYLES SUB

94
KA 20-00330

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
ALVIN KING

Assault

  PHILIP ROTHSCHILD 10
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

95
KA 21-01800

PEOPLE
    V
ALVIN KING

CPL art 440

TO BE ARGUED WITH #94

96
KA 17-00562

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
LEVI WRIGHT, JR.

Burglary

  BRIDGET L. FIELD 10
  LISA GRAY 10

97
KA 22-00438

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
ADRIAN MCDOWELL

Criminal Possession Weapon

  ROBERT WILLIAM WARD 10
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

98
KA 20-00059

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
QUINTIN J. MCWILLIAMS

Criminal Possession Weapon

  TONYA JEAN PLANK 10
  MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 10

99
KA 20-01206

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
FIDENCIO GONZALEZ

Predatory Sexual Assault

  BRADLEY E. KEEM 10
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

100
KA 19-00110

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
MARLIN JOSEPH

Criminal Possession Weapon

  CLEA WEISS 10
  MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 10

101
KA 21-01236

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JONATHON HERMAN

Sexual Abuse

     RYAN J. MULDOON SUB
  TODD J. CASELLA 5

102
KA 22-00170

PEOPLE
    V
MATTHEW C. SMITH

Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

     ROSEMARIE RICHARDS SUB

103
CA 22-00192

PLAY

WALTER R.
    V
STATE OF NEW YORK

Mental Hygiene Law

  REBECCA L. KONST 15
  LAURA ETLINGER 15

104
CA 22-00442

PLAY

DANIELLE WARE
    V
JENTSCH & CO., INC.

Summary Judgment

  JACOB A. PIORKOWSKI 15
  JENNA W. KLUCSIK 15
  DAVID RAY ADAMS 15
  ROBERT J. CONNOR, JR. 15

105
CA 22-00583

BENDERSON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC
    V
TOWN OF ORCHARD PARK

CPLR art 78

OVER THE TERM

106
CA 22-00784

PLAY

CLIFFORD WALLER
    V
ADMAR SUPPLY CO., INC.

Summary Judgment

  FLORINA ALTSHILER 10
  ALAN D. VOOS 10
  MARIA T. MASTRIANO 10

107
CA 22-00184

PLAY

ADVANCED PHYSICAL MEDICINE
    V
UTICA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Summary Judgment

  MICHELE E. DETRAGLIA 15
  CHERYL F. KORMAN 15

108
CA 22-00703

CARLOS RAMIREZ-HERNANDEZ
    V
MAVIS TIRE SUPPLY, LLC

Personal Injury

SETTLED

109
CA 22-00704

CARLOS RAMIREZ-HERNANDEZ
    V
MAVIS TIRE SUPPLY, LLC

Personal Injury

TO BE ARGUED WITH #108

110
CA 22-00430

PLAY

IN THE MATTER OF
NIAGARA FALLS CAPTAINS AND LIEUTENANTS ASSN AND CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS

Arbitration

     JAMES B. TUTTLE SUB
  MICHAEL EDWARD HICKEY 15

111
CA 22-00606

PLAY

CODY RAY GERNATT
    V
MICHAEL W. GREGOIRE

Summary Judgment

  BLAKE JOSEPH ZACCAGNINO 15
  OWEN DEMUTH 10

112
CA 22-00909

PLAY

DIANNE VITKUS
    V
CREEKWALK HOUSING, LLC

Summary Judgment

  MATTHEW A. LENHARD 15
  JOHN WALLACE 15
  PATRICIA A. LYNN-FORD 15
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.