1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
January Term

Wed Jan 11 Argument #52

KA 14-01238

PEOPLE
    V
LATWANN EVERSON

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered June 23, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the first degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the first degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

47
KA 21-01285

PEOPLE
    V
MICHAEL G GORTON

Violation of Probation

     BRADLEY E. KEEM SUB
     JOSHUA J. TONRA SUB

48
KA 18-01565

PEOPLE
    V
TYUS D. EDGE

Robbery

     CAROLYN ROSE WALTHER SUB
  SCOTT MYLES SUB

49
KA 15-01369

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
WENDELL D. SMITH

Criminal Possession Weapon

  KATHLEEN P. REARDON 10
  MERIDETH H. SMITH 10

50
KA 18-02088

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
RITCHY C. BELTRAN

Criminal Possession Weapon

  PAUL SKIP LAISURE 10
  KAYLAN C. PORTER 5

51
KA 18-02032

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
TERRY L. WILLIAMS

Murder

  BRIAN SHIFFRIN 10
  MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 10

52
KA 14-01238

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
LATWANN EVERSON

Assault

  THOMAS MANNING LEITH 15
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

53
KA 20-00223

PEOPLE
    V
LATWANN EVERSON

CPL art 440

TO BE ARGUED WITH #52

54
KAH 21-01768

PEOPLE EX REL., SALEEM SPENCER
    V
ANTHONY J ANNUCCI

Habeas Corpus

     VERONICA L. REED SUB
     SEAN P. MIX SUB

55
KA 17-01339

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JORDAN EVANS

Murder

  DAVID R. JUERGENS 10
  SCOTT MYLES 10

56
KA 18-01755

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
KEITH A. B., JR.

Youthful Offender

  PAUL SKIP LAISURE 15
  MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 10

57
CAF 20-01207

PLAY

IN THE MATTER OF
JERIMIAH H.

Terminate Parental Rights

  CHARLES J. GREENBERG 5
  REBECCA CRONAN HOFFMAN 5
  ANTHONY DAVID CHABALA 5

58
CAF 21-01784

RICHARD RAWLEIGH
    V
PEARL R. ZAMBITO

Family Offense

     VERONICA L. REED SUB

59
CAF 22-00458

IN THE MATTER OF
INDIGO S.

Neglect

     DAVID J. PAJAK SUB
     VERONICA L. REED SUB
  MARY ANNE CONNELL 10
     WENDY S. SISSON SUB

60
CA 22-00614

PLAY

RACHEL ECKERT
    V
CAROLETTE MEADOWS

Dismiss Complaint

  RACHEL ECKERT 30

61
CA 21-01174

PLAY

NUSHAWN W.
    V
STATE OF NEW YORK

Mental Hygiene Law

  KATHRYN B. FRIEDMAN 15
  JONATHAN D. HITSOUS 10

62
CA 22-00315

PLAY

FORRESTAL GRAY
    V
SUMMIT ASSETS, LLC

Summary Judgment

  MELISSA L. VINCTON 15
  PHILIP A. MILCH 15

63
CA 22-00783

PLAY

CHRISTINE PRESTON
    V
DALE R. NICHOLS

Dismiss Complaint

  MICHAEL J. WEGMAN 15
  DAVID D. BENZ 15

64
CA 22-00372

PLAY

HARRIET BOARDMAN
    V
JOANNE VAN DYKE

Summary Judgment

  ANDREW LAVOOTT BLUESTONE 15
  DAVID LAWRENCE COOK 15

65
CA 21-01552

PLAY

BRITTANI L. SADLER
    V
MICHAH S. JAMES

Summary Judgment

  DANIEL J. CERCONE 15
     JAMES M. VANDETTE 15

66
CA 21-01727

PLAY

DONNA RENZI
    V
THOMAS RENZI

Divorce

  JENNIFER M. LORENZ 15
  KELLY A. FERON 10

67
CA 21-01624

PLAY

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
    V
RODNEY C. NEWHOUSE

Foreclosure

     JAMIE C. KRAPF SUB
  RICK GOODELL 15
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.