Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered June 23, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the first degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the first degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.
Violation of Probation
BRADLEY E. KEEM | SUB | |
JOSHUA J. TONRA | SUB |
Robbery
CAROLYN ROSE WALTHER | SUB | |
SCOTT MYLES | SUB |
Criminal Possession Weapon
KATHLEEN P. REARDON | 10 | |
MERIDETH H. SMITH | 10 |
Criminal Possession Weapon
PAUL SKIP LAISURE | 10 | |
KAYLAN C. PORTER | 5 |
CPL art 440
Habeas Corpus
VERONICA L. REED | SUB | |
SEAN P. MIX | SUB |
Youthful Offender
PAUL SKIP LAISURE | 15 | |
MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II | 10 |
Terminate Parental Rights
CHARLES J. GREENBERG | 5 | |
REBECCA CRONAN HOFFMAN | 5 | |
ANTHONY DAVID CHABALA | 5 |
Family Offense
VERONICA L. REED | SUB |
Neglect
DAVID J. PAJAK | SUB | |
VERONICA L. REED | SUB | |
MARY ANNE CONNELL | 10 | |
WENDY S. SISSON | SUB |
Mental Hygiene Law
KATHRYN B. FRIEDMAN | 15 | |
JONATHAN D. HITSOUS | 10 |
Summary Judgment
MELISSA L. VINCTON | 15 | |
PHILIP A. MILCH | 15 |
Dismiss Complaint
MICHAEL J. WEGMAN | 15 | |
DAVID D. BENZ | 15 |
Summary Judgment
ANDREW LAVOOTT BLUESTONE | 15 | |
DAVID LAWRENCE COOK | 15 |
Summary Judgment
DANIEL J. CERCONE | 15 | |
JAMES M. VANDETTE | 15 |
Foreclosure
JAMIE C. KRAPF | SUB | |
RICK GOODELL | 15 |
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.