1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
January Term

Mon Jan 09 Argument #3

KA 19-00813

PEOPLE
    V
JOSHUA S. VANWUYCKHUYSE

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Alex R. Renzi, J.), rendered January 16, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of aggravated family offense.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

1
TP 22-01440

JAVON M. RIDGEWAY
    V
ANTHONY ANNUCCI

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

     NORMAN P. EFFMAN SUB
     FRANK BRADY SUB

2
TP 22-01494

JOHN DOE
    V
SUNY BROCKPORT

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

     JILL L. YONKERS SUB
     CHRISTOPHER ANDREW LIBERATI-CONANT SUB

3
KA 19-00813

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JOSHUA S. VANWUYCKHUYSE

Aggravated Family Offense

  DAVID R. JUERGENS 5
  SCOTT MYLES 5

4
KA 21-01502

PEOPLE
    V
CARLOS STACKHOUSE

Assault

     MELISSA SWARTZ SUB
     REID W. GULSVIG SUB

5
KA 19-00536

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
SEDETRICE WRIGHT

Criminal Possession Weapon

  CLEA WEISS 10
  MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 10

6
KA 22-00258

PEOPLE
    V
GRACE MITCHELL

Burglary

SETTLED

7
KA 19-01414

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
AKIL MABRY

Criminal Possession Weapon

  PAUL SKIP LAISURE 15
  MERIDETH H. SMITH 10

8
KA 19-00814

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JOSHUA S. VANWUYCKHUYSE

Driving While Intoxicated

  DAVID R. JUERGENS 5
  SCOTT MYLES 5

9
KA 21-01501

PEOPLE
    V
CARLOS STACKHOUSE

Manslaughter

     MELISSA SWARTZ SUB
     REID W. GULSVIG SUB

10
KAH 22-00827

PEOPLE EX REL. CHARLES FLOYD
    V
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Habeas Corpus

     LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI SUB
     KATE H. NEPVEU SUB

11
CAF 20-01536

MELISSA FROMM
    V
DENNIS GREENE

Visitation

     CHARLES J. GREENBERG SUB
     KELLY LINN BALL SUB

12
CA 22-01254

PLAY

ROBERT STERN
    V
GOLUB CORPORATION

Summary Judgment

  ROBERT STERN 15
  JOHN L. BETSEY 10
  DAVID M. KATZ 15

13
CA 22-00914

PLAY

GREAT LAKES ANESTHESIOLOGY, P.C.
    V
DORON FELDMAN

Summary Judgment

  DORON FELDMAN 15
  JAMES W. GRABLE, JR. 10
  JARED K. COOK 15

14
CA 22-01408

PLAY

LEE FANG
    V
TOWN OF AMHERST

Summary Judgment

  LEE FANG 15
  MICHAEL J. CHMIEL 15

15
CA 22-00450

CHS, INC.
    V
LAND O' LAKES PURINA FEED, LLC

Amend Pleadings

OVER THE TERM

16
CA 22-00466

PLAY

WILLIAM ARMSTRONG
    V
TOWN OF TONAWANDA

Dismiss Complaint

  JONATHAN G. JOHNSEN 15
  CHRISTOPHER MAUGANS 15

17
CA 22-00012

PLAY

THOMAS CARCONE
    V
JAMES NOON

Dismiss Complaint

  DAVID ANTHONY LONGERETTA 15
     RONALD G. DUNN 15

18
CA 22-00815

THOMAS E. CARCONE
    V
JAMES NOON

Dismiss Complaint

TO BE ARGUED WITH #17

19
CA 21-01647

GARRETT J. WAGNER
    V
CASSIE C. WAGNER

Divorce

OVER THE TERM

20
CA 21-01527

PLAY

KENNETH HEINRICH
    V
KELLEY A. SERENS, NP

Summary Judgment

  JENNA W. KLUCSIK 10
  DUSTIN J. BROCKNER 10
  SIDNEY P. COMINSKY 15

21
CA 22-00912

KENNETH HEINRICH
    V
KELLEY A. SERENS

Summary Judgment

TO BE ARGUED WITH #20

22
CA 22-00382

PLAY

CHRISTINA A. WESTERMEYER
    V
PAUL A. WHELAN

Summary Judgment

  ANDREW T. GILL 15
  ALYSON C. CULLITON 15
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.