1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
October Term

Mon Oct 17 Argument #764

OP 22-00744

BOWERS DEVELOPMENT, LLC
    V
ONEIDA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

Proceeding pursuant to Eminent Domain Procedure Law § 207 (initiated in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court for the Fourth Judicial Department) to annul the determination of respondent Oneida County Industrial Development Agency to condemn certain real property.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

755
KA 21-00471

PEOPLE
    V
KENNETH BARBER

Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

     ANDREW D. CORREIA SUB

756
KA 17-01154

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
TIMOTHY M. ANDERSON

Assault

  JONATHAN FREDERIC GARVIN 10
  MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II 10

757
KA 18-01372

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
CEDRICK L. MITCHELL

Grand Larceny

  DREW R. DUBRIN 5
  KAYLAN C. PORTER 5

758
KA 19-01824

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
ANNABEL PIETROCARLO

Assault

  ANDREW FISKE 10
  DANIEL J. PUNCH 5

759
KA 20-00956

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
RUBIN JONES, III

Criminal Sexual Act

  THOMAS MANNING LEITH 10
  KAITLYN M. GUPTILL 10

760
KA 21-00472

PEOPLE
    V
KENNETH BARBER

Driving While Ability Impaired

     ANDREW D. CORREIA SUB

761
KA 19-00213

PEOPLE
    V
TARQUIN Q. CALDWELL

Criminal Contempt

     BRIAN SHIFFRIN SUB
  MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II SUB

762
KA 21-01012

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
TARL REYNOLDS

Criminal Sexual Act

  WILLIAM G. PIXLEY 10
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

763
KA 21-00549

PEOPLE
    V
JASON B. OSGOOD

Burglary

     BRADLEY E. KEEM SUB
     V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON SUB

764
OP 22-00744

PLAY

BOWERS DEVELOPMENT, LLC
    V
ONEIDA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

Eminent Domain

  MICHAEL A. FOGEL 15
  PAUL J. GOLDMAN 15

765
CAF 21-01615

PLAY

KRISTEN M. GRIMES
    V
FELIX A. MEDERO, JR.

Support

     ALEXANDER KOROTKIN SUB
  ELIZABETH DEUTSCH TAFFE 15

766
CA 21-01545

PLAY

RYAN WEAVER
    V
DERONDE TIRE SUPPLY, INC.

Summary Judgment

  ANDREW J. KOWALEWSKI 15
  DAVID W. POLAK 10

767
CA 22-00137

PLAY

SHANE CHRISTOPHER BUCZEK
    V
TOWN OF EVANS

Dismiss Complaint

  SHANE CHRISTOPHER BUCZEK 10
     MARC STEVEN SMITH SUB
  SARAH E. HANSEN 10
  KARL ERICH DANIEL 10

768
CA 21-01464

PLAY

MICHAEL J. TARSEL
    V
JAMES J. TROMBINO

Damages

  MALLORY KASS SMITH 15
  KAREN GUYDER FELTER 15

769
CA 22-00501

PLAY

ROBERT HYDE
    V
BVSHSSF SYRACUSE LLC

Summary Judgment

  ANTHONY R. MARTOCCIA 15
  LAURIE A. VAHEY 15

770
CA 21-01135

PLAY

MELISSA NEAL
    V
FEDDER LOFTS, LLC

Foreclosure

  JENNIFER PERSICO 15
  JAMES I. MYERS 15

771
CA 22-00101

PLAY

COLLEEN O'HARA
    V
CITY OF BUFFALO

Summary Judgment

     DANIEL JOSEPH MUSCARELLA SUB
  RICHARD A. GRIMM, III 10

772
CA 21-01196

PLAY

GREGORY K. JOHNSON
    V
AUBURN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL

Summary Judgment

  GABRIELLE L. BULL 15
  ERIN GEORGE MEAD 10
  TERRENCE J. HOFFMAN 15

773
CA 21-01619

TOWN OF OGDEN
    V
JEREMY WOLF

Personal Injury

     BRITTANY L. PENBERTHY SUB
     KEITH EDWARD O'TOOLE SUB

774
CA 21-01663

PLAY

RYAN FOOTE
    V
JAMES MARCH

Summary Judgment

  JON C. DUPEE, JR. 15
  JUSTIN L. HENDRICKS 15
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.