Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Daniel J. Furlong,J.), entered July 7, 2021. The order, among other things, denied the relief requested in petitioners' supplemental verified petition/complaint in its entirety.
Attempted Murder
JANET C. SOMES | SUB | |
KAYLAN C. PORTER | SUB |
Criminal Possession Weapon
JANET C. SOMES | SUB | |
LISA GRAY | SUB |
Robbery
Criminal Possession Weapon
KIMBERLY J. CZAPRANSKI | SUB | |
MERIDETH H. SMITH | SUB |
Attempted Robbery
PAUL B. WATKINS | 10 | |
MERIDETH H. SMITH | SUB |
Criminal Possession Weapon
KATHRYN B. FRIEDMAN | 10 | |
MORGAN RILEY MAYER | 10 |
Summary Judgment
PHILIP ROTHSCHILD | 10 | |
KAITLYN M. GUPTILL | 10 |
Violation of Probation
Summary Judgment
LEE ALCOTT | 15 |
CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of
PHILIP A. MILCH | SUB | |
KEVIN C. HU | SUB |
Summary Judgment
JAMES L. ALEXANDER | 15 | |
MICHAEL C. PRETSCH | 15 |
Summary Judgment
Counsel Fees
Probate
CPLR art 78
MARC A. ROMANOWSKI | 15 | |
CHARLES D. GRIECO | SUB | |
SEAN W. HOPKINS | 15 |
Divorce
MICHAEL STEINBERG | 20 | |
FRANCIS C. AFFRONTI | 15 | |
WALTER JAMES BURKARD | 15 |
Counsel Fees
Divorce
Divorce
Divorce
CPLR art 78
NORMAN P. EFFMAN | SUB | |
ALEXANDRIA TWINEM | SUB |
Contract
ROBERT ROSS RADEL | 15 | |
JOSEPH G. MAKOWSKI | SUB |
Summary Judgment
VIRGINIA CLAIRE GRAPENSTETER | 10 | |
WARREN B. ROSENBAUM | 15 |
Dismiss Petition
GARY A. ABRAHAM | 15 | |
J. MICHAEL NAUGHTON | 10 |
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.