1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
July Term

Tue Jul 12 Argument #586.1

CAE 22-00895

TIM HARKENRIDER
    V
GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL

Appeal from a decision and order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Patrick F. McAllister, A.J.), entered June 1, 2022, in a proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16. The decision and order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of the Parent Party for leave to intervene, to alter the petition requirements and to schedule a primary for the office of United States Senator for August 23, 2022.

Election Appeals

Please be advised that the Court will convene at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, July 12, 2022, to hear election appeals. The filing deadline for appellants is Friday, July 1st; respondents’ deadline is Wednesday, July 6th; and the deadline for reply briefs is noon on July 8th.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

586.1
CAE 22-00895

PLAY

TIM HARKENRIDER
    V
GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL

Election Law

  RORY JUDE BELLANTONI 15
  BRIAN L. QUAIL 10
  ANDREA WILLIAM TRENTO 10
  CRAIG R. BUCKI 10
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.