Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Alex R. Renzi, J.), entered December 28, 2020. The order, among other things, directed that respondent be retained in a secure facility operated by petitioner.
Sentence
ROBERT M. GRAFF | SUB | |
LAURA THERESA JORDAN | SUB |
Sentence
KATHLEEN E. CASEY | SUB | |
THOMAS H. BRANDT | SUB |
Sentence
KATHLEEN E. CASEY | SUB | |
THOMAS H. BRANDT | SUB |
Manslaughter
GABRIELA E. WOLFE | SUB | |
KAYLAN C. PORTER | SUB |
Aggravated Family Offense
KELIANN M. ARGY | SUB | |
ADAM W. KOCH | SUB |
Burglary
STEPHANIE R. DIGIORGIO | 10 | |
MICHAEL ANTHONY LABELLA, JR. | 15 |
Robbery
CARA A. WALDMAN | 10 | |
V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON | 5 |
Aggravated D.W.I.
ROBERT J. GALLAMORE | SUB | |
AMY LEIGH HALLENBECK | SUB |
Driving While Ability Impaired
KELIANN M. ARGY | SUB | |
ADAM W. KOCH | SUB |
Attempted Criminal Possession Weapon
BETH A. RATCHFORD | SUB | |
MERIDETH H. SMITH | SUB |
Summary Judgment
E.W. GARO GOZIGIAN | SUB | |
KENNETH L. BOBROW | SUB |
CPLR art 78
Summary Judgment
FRANK M. BOGULSKI | 15 | |
JONATHAN D. COX | 15 |
Mental Hygiene Law
TRACIE MICHELLE HIATT | 10 | |
ALLYSON B. LEVINE | 10 |
Summary Judgment
JOHN A. COLLINS | 10 | |
ERIC D. ANDREW | 15 |
Summary Judgment
JACLYN S. WANEMAKER | SUB |
Summary Judgment
Summary Judgment
MARC A. SCHULZ | 15 | |
SAMANTHA V. CATONE | 15 | |
EDWARD L. SMITH, III | 15 |
Renewal
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.