1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
March Term

Tue Mar 29 Argument #312

CA 21-01022

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM Z. REICH

Appeal from a decision and order of the Surrogate's Court, Erie County (Acea M. Mosey, S.), entered June 16, 2021. The decision and order denied the motion of respondent to dismiss the claims and dismissed the statute of limitations defense.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

302
KA 20-01438

PEOPLE
    V
JOSEPH MONTGOMERY

Criminal Possession Weapon

     ERIC SUN SUB
     KAITLYN M. GUPTILL SUB

303
KA 20-01439

PEOPLE
    V
JOSEPH MONTGOMERY

Assault

TO BE ARGUED WITH #302

304
KA 16-00442

PEOPLE
    V
GREGORY FRANKLIN

Predatory Sexual Assault Against a Child

     PATRICK J. MARTHAGE SUB
     STEVEN G. COX SUB

305
KA 18-02096

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JORDAN EVANS

Criminal Possession Weapon

  DAVID R. JUERGENS 10
  KAYLAN C. PORTER 10

306
KA 20-01352

PEOPLE
    V
BRANDON J. CONGDON

Attempted Strangulation

     CAITLIN M. CONNELLY SUB
     JOHN C. TUNNEY SUB

307
KA 18-00138

PEOPLE
    V
WILFREDO ARROYO

Sentence

     JANET C. SOMES SUB
     LEAH R. MERVINE SUB

308
KA 19-02142

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
TRAVIS O. HILL

Attempted Murder

  BRIAN SHIFFRIN 10
  SCOTT MYLES 10

309
KA 19-01187

PEOPLE
    V
GREGORY FRANKLIN

CPL art 440

     ANTHONY F. BRIGANO SUB
  EVAN ESSWEIN SUB

310
KA 20-00295

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
ROBERT A. MAHARREY

Assault on a Police Officer

  JOHN J. MORRISSEY 10
     ROBERT J. SHOEMAKER SUB

311
CA 21-01337

PLAY

SCOTT THOMAS
    V
NORTH COUNTRY FAMILY HEALTH CENTER, INC.

Summary Judgment

  ANTHONY R. MARTOCCIA 15
  CORY SCHOONMAKER 15

312
CA 21-01022

PLAY

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM Z. REICH

Probate

  RICHARD T. SULLIVAN 10
  THOMAS J. GAFFNEY 10

313
OP 21-01638

PLAY

BRANDON MCNAIR
    V
SCOTT D. MCNAMARA

Original Proceeding Pursuant to CPLR art 78

  REBECCA L. WITTMAN 10
  EVAN ESSWEIN 10

314
CA 21-00984

PLAY

PHILLIP HANN
    V
S&J MORRELL, INC.

Summary Judgment

  KEITH A. O'HARA 10
  MICHAEL A. DONLON 10

315
CA 21-00291

PLAY

ABLA MOHAMED
    V
HANI ABUHAMRA

Dismiss Complaint

  THOMAS J. GAFFNEY 15
  ALAN WILLIAMS 15

316
CA 21-00706

PLAY

ALL AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY
    V
TENNILLE WILSON

Contract

     JOSHUA LEVI SELTZER 15
  KEVIN ARTHUR LANE 10

317
CA 21-01296

PLAY

JENNIFER S. STROH
    V
KIMBERLY M. KROMER

Summary Judgment

  STEPHANIE MESSINA 15
  DAVID W. POLAK 10

318
CA 21-00369

LG 70 DOE
    V
AMHERST YOUTH HOCKEY, INC.

Dismiss Complaint

OVER THE TERM

319
CA 21-00979

PLAY

ARISTA DEVELOPMENT, LLC
    V
CLEARMIND HOLDINGS, LLC

Summary Judgment

  JUSTIN S. WHITE 15
  KEVIN T. O'BRIEN 15

320
CA 21-00576

PLAY

RHONDA L. ANASTASI
    V
GARY ANASTASI

Divorce

  JAMES P. RENDA 15
  NICHOLAS JOSEPH NARCHUS 10

321
CA 21-00796

NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
    V
CITY OF SYRACUSE

CPLR art 78

OVER THE TERM

322
CA 21-01082

PLAY

ROBERT CUMMINS
    V
RICHARD MIDDAUGH

Summary Judgment

  JILL L. YONKERS 15
  MICHAEL C. LANCER 15
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.