1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
January Term

Tue Jan 04 Argument #22

CA 21-00314

CIMATO ENTERPRISES, INC.
    V
TOWN OF CLARENCE

Appeal and cross appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, III, J.), entered February 2, 2021. The order and judgment dismissed the CPLR article 78 petition.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

1
KA 18-01053

PEOPLE
    V
LAMAR M. PACE

Sentence

     JAMES A. HOBBS SUB
     LEAH R. MERVINE SUB

2
KA 19-00975

PEOPLE
    V
OSVALDO MONTALVO-SANTIAGO

Sentence

     ROBERT L. KEMP SUB
     MINDY F. VANLEUVAN SUB

3
KA 20-00409

PEOPLE
    V
MUHAMMAD IRVING

Sentence

     PIOTR BANASIAK SUB
     JESSICA N. CARBONE SUB

4
KA 18-00450

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JARED KOEBERLE

Rape

  BRADLEY E. KEEM 10
  V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON 5

5
KAH 20-01156

PLAY

WAYNE C. JAMES
    V
DEBORAH MCCULLOCH

Habeas Corpus

  KATHRYN FESTINE HARTNETT 10
  LAURA ETLINGER 10

6
KAH 20-01685

PLAY

WAYNE C. JAMES
    V
DEBORAH MCCULLOCH

Reargument

7
KA 18-01926

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JASON M. SINGLETON

Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

  JOHN A. CIRANDO 10
  V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON 5

8
KA 17-00047

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
KENNETH J. ADAMS

Burglary

  CAROLYN ROSE WALTHER 10
  KAYLAN C. PORTER 5

9
KA 18-00692

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
TYQUAN JOHNSON

Burglary

  DREW R. DUBRIN 10
  DEREK HARNSBERGER 10

10
KA 18-00694

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
TYQUAN JOHNSON

Burglary

11
CAF 20-00095

PLAY

IN THE MATTER OF
ISABELLA S.

Neglect

  DANIELLE K. BLACKABY 10

12
CAF 20-00837

PLAY

STEVEN L. COOLEY
    V
REBECCA A. ROLOSON

Custody

  CHARLES J. GREENBERG 5
     KEITH R. LORD SUB

13
CAF 20-00838

PLAY

STEVEN L. COOLEY
    V
REBECCA A. ROLOSON

Neglect

14
CA 20-01586

PLAY

CITY OF JAMESTOWN
    V
TOWN COUNCIL OF TOWN OF ELLICOTT

CPLR art 78

  ALLISON B. FIUT 15
  STEPHANIE CAMPBELL 15

15
CA 20-01587

PLAY

CITY OF JAMESTOWN
    V
TOWN BOARD OF TOWN OF ELLICOTT

CPLR art 78

16
CA 20-01588

PLAY

CITY OF JAMESTOWN
    V
TOWN COUNCIL OF TOWN OF ELLICOTT

CPLR art 78

17
CA 21-01065

PLAY

ANDREW DEWOLF
    V
WAYNE COUNTY

Arbitration

  ANDREW DEWOLF 30
  JAMES P. YOUNGS 10

18
CA 21-01069

PLAY

ANDREW DEWOLF
    V
WAYNE COUNTY

Reargument

19
CA 21-00598

RONALD J. REUKAUF, SR.
    V
COLLEEN M. KRAFT

Divorce

     WILLIAM R. HITES SUB

20
CA 21-00759

PLAY

IBUKUN OGUNBEKUN
    V
STRONG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

Vacate Dismissal

  IBUKUN OGUNBEKUN 15
  MICHAEL C. PRETSCH 15

21
CA 21-01043

PLAY

RONALD BENDERSON 1995 TRUST
    V
ERIE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION

Preliminary Injunction

  R. ANTHONY RUPP, III 10
  DAVID J. MCNAMARA 15

22
CA 21-00314

PLAY

CIMATO ENTERPRISES, INC.
    V
TOWN OF CLARENCE

CPLR art 78

  FRANK J. JACOBSON 15
  D. CHARLES ROBERTS 15

23
CA 21-00711

CITIBANK, N.A.
    V
THOMAS J. GIFFORD

Summary Judgment

     MICHAEL C. MANNIELLO SUB
     LEIGHTON R. BURNS SUB

24
CA 21-00334

GESHAWN CRITTLETON
    V
ANTHONY ANNUCCI

CPLR art 78

     LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI SUB
     FRANK BRADY SUB
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.