1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
November Term

Wed Dec 01 Argument #1084

KA 17-01091

PEOPLE
    V
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ-RICARDO

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Francis A. Affronti, J.), rendered March 21, 2017. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal contempt in the first degree.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

1075
KA 19-01432

PEOPLE
    V
EUGENE H. SCOTT

Assault

     TODD SLOAN SUB
     ERICH D. GROME SUB

1076
KA 20-01184

PEOPLE
    V
SID HARRISON

Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

     DAVID P. ELKOVITCH SUB
     DAWN CATERA LUPI SUB

1077
KA 21-00061

PEOPLE
    V
KRISTEN N. DEMAY

Petit Larceny

     JANE I. YOON SUB
     SUSAN M. HOWARD SUB

1078
KA 20-00591

PEOPLE
    V
MARK K. MCDERMOTT

Burglary

     JOHN J. RASPANTE SUB
     STEVEN G. COX SUB

1079
KA 20-00144

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
TRAMMELL BROWN

Criminal Possession of a Firearm

  ERIC SUN 10
  JESSICA N. CARBONE 10

1080
KA 18-02068

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
RAKIM YANCY

Assault

  GARY MULDOON 15
  LISA GRAY 10

1081
KA 20-00245

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JONATHON WHITE

Attempted Murder

  MICHAEL STACHOWSKI 15
  DANIEL J. PUNCH 5

1082
KA 19-01904

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
CHARLES DUBOIS

Murder

  J. SCOTT PORTER 10
  KENNETH H. TYLER, JR. 10

1083
KA 19-00799

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JOSUE RODRIGUEZ-RIVERA

Criminal Possession Weapon

  DEBORAH K. JESSEY 5
  DANIELLE E. PHILLIPS 5

1084
KA 17-01091

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ-RICARDO

Criminal Contempt

  JANET C. SOMES 5
  KAYLAN C. PORTER 5

1085
CAF 21-00162

PLAY

IN THE MATTER OF
RAJEA T., JR.

Intervention

  ASHLEY STAMEGNA 15
  HEATHER E. MURRAY 0
  DAVID J. PAJAK 5

1086
CAF 20-00951

PLAY

IN THE MATTER OF
BRIANNA E.

Abuse

  PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR. 10
  KRISTOPHER STEVENS 10
     KIMBERLY ANN WOOD 5

1087
CAF 20-01662

DANIELLE E.P.
    V
CHRISTOPHER N.

Paternity

OVER THE TERM

1088
CA 20-01539

JANET E. ENOCH
    V
MARSHALL FARMS GROUP, LTD.

Dismiss Complaint

OFF THE CALENDAR

1089
CA 21-00664

PLAY

JENNIFER DENNING
    V
GARRETT WHITTALL

Default Judgment

  DAVID AARON KAGLE 10

1090
CA 21-00479

PLAY

IN THE MATTER OF
THE P. & E.T. FOUNDATION

Preliminary Injunction

  KENNETH A. MANNING 15
  KATHLEEN M. TREASURE 10
  JENNIFER G. FLANNERY 15

1091
CA 20-00267

PLAY

NORMAN KILEY
    V
ALAN POSNER, M.D.

Discovery

  JEANNE M. VINAL 15
  AMANDA C. ROSSI 15
  KATE LORRAINE HARTMAN 15

1092
CA 21-00181

PLAY

GLENN FREELAND
    V
ERIE COUNTY

Summary Judgment

     ANTHONY B. TARGIA SUB
  KEVIN T. STOCKER 15

1093
CA 20-01409

PLAY

MICHAEL ROYSTER
    V
BREAKWATERS TOWNHOMES ASSOCIATION OF BUFFALO, INC.

Personal Injury

  JACQUELINE R. GARREN 15
  LINDA J. MARSH 15

1094
CA 21-00716

MICHAEL ROYSTER
    V
BREAKWATERS TOWNHOMES ASSOCIATION OF BUFFALO, INC.

Personal Injury

TO BE ARGUED WITH #1093

1095
CA 20-01510

NOAH R. PFIEFFER
    V
JOHN P. KARLQUIST

Summary Judgment

SETTLED

1096
CA 20-01511

KAYLEE MARSFELDER
    V
JOHN P. KARLQUIST

Summary Judgment

SETTLED

RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.