1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
November Term

Mon Nov 29 Argument #1034

KA 21-00605

PEOPLE
    V
WENDELL GRIFFIN

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Stephen J. Dougherty, J.), rendered July 19, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

1031
TP 21-00955

RANDY WILLIAMS
    V
ANTHONY ANNUCCI

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

     LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI SUB
     BEEZLY KIERNAN SUB

1032
KA 19-00513

PEOPLE
    V
ANTHONY RUBINO

Attempted Burglary

     BARBARA J. DAVIES SUB
     DAVID A. HERATY SUB

1033
KA 19-01046

PEOPLE
    V
JOHN M. GRABOWSKI

Sentence

     JOHN J. MORRISSEY SUB
     ROBERT J. SHOEMAKER SUB

1034
KA 21-00605

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
WENDELL GRIFFIN

Murder

  STEVEN M. SHARP 10
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

1035
KA 20-00249

PEOPLE
    V
TRAVIS CARTER

Sentence

     CHRISTINE M. COOK SUB
     KENNETH H. TYLER, JR. SUB

1036
KA 17-01081

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JOSE M. RIVERA

Resentence

  JANET C. SOMES 5
  DANIEL GROSS 5

1037
KA 19-01650

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
DON LEWIS

Criminal Possession Weapon

  JANE I. YOON 10
  MATTHEW B. POWERS 5

1038
KA 18-00613

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
TERRY HARRIS

Aggravated Criminal Contempt

  KRISTEN N. MCDERMOTT 15
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

1039
KA 19-00583

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
GHANEM ABUGHANEM

Strangulation

  NICHOLAS P. DIFONZO 10
  MINDY F. VANLEUVAN 10

1040
CAF 20-00193

PLAY

MARCUS WRIGHT
    V
CHRISTINE HEARD

Custody

     WILLIAM D. BRODERICK, JR. SUB
  DEBORAH J. SCINTA 5
     REBECCA CONSIDINE SUB

1041
CAF 21-00511

PLAY

DANIEL P. YOUNT, II
    V
SARAH A. YOUNT

Visitation

  REBECCA L. KONST 15

1042
OP 21-00853

PLAY

BRETT B. TRUETT
    V
ONEIDA COUNTY

Eminent Domain

  DENNIS PHILLIPS 15
  CHRISTOPHER M. MCDONALD 15

1043
CA 21-00008

PLAY

SETH O'HARROW
    V
CASCADES CANADA, INC.

Summary Judgment

  ERIC N. BAILEY 15
  DAVID M. KATZ 15
  ROBERT SCUMACI 15
  GREGORY V. PAJAK 15

1044
CA 20-01217

KRISTEN GELLMAN
    V
CHARLES PRIORE

Custody

SETTLED

1045
CA 21-00431

PLAY

ROBERT MALONEY
    V
DEAN DEROBERTS, M.D

Dismiss Complaint

     JESSE B. BALDWIN 10
  ROBERT E. LAHM 10

1046
CA 20-01181

LAWRENCE PEREZ
    V
ANTHONY ANNUCCI

CPLR art 78

     JUSTIN COLIN BONUS SUB
     MARTIN A. HOTVET SUB

1047
CA 21-00044

PLAY

SPRINGWOOD VILLAGE, LLC
    V
STANLEY HOLDINGS LLC

Summary Judgment

  JOHN A. COLLINS 10
  GERALD P. GORMAN 15

1048
CA 21-00202

PLAY

THOMAS BRUCKEL
    V
TOWN OF CONESUS

Summary Judgment

  JOHN A. MANCUSO 15
  JONATHAN R. TANTILLO 15

1049
CA 20-01229

PLAY

NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY
    V
RIDGEWOOD DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY LLC

Summary Judgment

     ROBERT A. SPOLZINO SUB
  ALLAN HOLLANDER 15

1050
CA 20-01447

PLAY

JOSE M. LAGARES
    V
CARRIER TERMINAL SERVICES, INC.

Summary Judgment

     ROBERT C. BAXTER SUB
  JENNA W. KLUCSIK 15
  THOMAS P. KAWALEC 15

1051
CA 21-00719

JOSE M. LAGARES
    V
CARRIER TERMINAL SERVICES, INC.

Reargument

TO BE ARGUED WITH #1050

RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.