1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
September Term

Wed Sep 08 Argument #729

CA 20-01222

BL DOE 2
    V
EDWIN FLEMING

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Deborah A. Chimes, J.), entered August 28, 2020. The order denied the motion of defendant Rochester City School District to dismiss the complaint.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

721
TP 21-00279

VINCENT HILL
    V
ANTHONY ANNUCCI

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

     ADAM W. KOCH SUB
     KATHLEEN M. TREASURE SUB

722
KA 20-01484

PEOPLE
    V
ROBERT DOUGLAS

Sex Offender Registration Act

     MATTHEW BELLINGER SUB
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER SUB

723
KA 19-00209

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
KYLE L. BORLAND

Attempted Burglary

  JOHN A. CIRANDO 10
     AMY LEIGH HALLENBECK SUB

724
KA 18-02278

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
KIVON DAVIS

Criminal Possession Weapon

  SARA A. GOLDFARB 10
  JESSICA N. CARBONE 10

725
KA 17-01344

PEOPLE
    V
SAMANTHA L. HUGHES

Kidnapping

     ANDREW G. MORABITO SUB
     LISA GRAY SUB

726
KA 21-00555

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JAMES ADAMS

Felony Driving While Intoxicated

  JOHN A. CIRANDO 10
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

727
KA 17-01712

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
WILBERT A. JACKSON, II

Criminal Possession Weapon

  KATHLEEN P. REARDON 10
  NANCY GILLIGAN 10

728
KA 17-01517

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JERMAINE GIBSON

Burglary

  WILLIAM CLAUSS 10
  SCOTT MYLES 10

729
CA 20-01222

PLAY

BL DOE 2
    V
EDWIN FLEMING

Dismiss Complaint

  ALISON K.L. MOYER SUB
  JOHN M. BANSBACH 5

730
CA 20-01223

BL DOE 3
    V
THE FEMALE ACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEART ACADEMY

Dismiss Complaint

  ALISON K.L. MOYER 10
  JOHN M. BANSBACH 5

731
CA 20-01224

BL DOE 4
    V
EDWIN D. FLEMING

Dismiss Complaint

  ALISON K.L. MOYER SUB
  JOHN M. BANSBACH 5

732
CA 20-01225

BL DOE 5
    V
EDWIN D. FLEMING

Dismiss Complaint

  ALISON K.L. MOYER SUB
  JOHN M. BANSBACH 5

733
CA 20-01226

BL DOE 7
    V
EDWIN D. FLEMING

Dismiss Complaint

  ALISON K.L. MOYER SUB
  JOHN M. BANSBACH 5

734
CA 20-01227

BL DOE 9
    V
EDWIN D. FLEMING

Dismiss Complaint

OVER THE TERM

735
CA 20-01228

VICTORIA VISIKO
    V
EDWIN D. FLEMING

Dismiss Complaint

  ALISON K.L. MOYER SUB
  JOHN M. BANSBACH 5

736
CA 21-00313

COMMUNITY RESORATION CORPORATION
    V
IGOR VALOSHKA

Summary Judgment

SETTLED

737
CA 21-00240

PLAY

BRIGHTON GRASSROOTS, LLC
    V
TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

Dismiss Complaint

  JACOB H. ZOGHLIN 15
  WARREN B. ROSENBAUM 15
  JOHN A. MANCUSO 15

738
CA 20-00871

PLAY

ABDUKADIR ABDULLAHI
    V
SADASHIV S. SHENOY, M.D.

Protective Order

  JOHN A. COLLINS 10
  JOHN TIMOTHY LOSS 10
  WILLIAM KALISH 15

739
CA 20-01366

PLAY

KAREN J. MURRAY
    V
NORTH GREECE FIRE DISTRICT

Dismiss Petition

  BRADLEY MARC PINSKY 15
     PATRICK J. FITZGERALD, III SUB
  TIMOTHY C. HANNIGAN 15

740
CA 21-00252

PLAY

ELIZABETH BRITT
    V
NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT II, LLC

Summary Judgment

  ROBERT L. VOLTZ 15
  ALYSON C. CULLITON 15
  JARED K. COOK 15

740.1
TP 21-00169

THOMAS EDWARDS
    V
ANTHONY ANNUCCI

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

     THOMAS EDWARDS SUB
     KATE H. NEPVEU SUB
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.