Appeal from a decision and order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Matthew J. Murphy, III, J.), entered August 18, 2020. The decision and order, insofar as appealed from, denied the application of plaintiff to serve a late notice of claim on defendant Town of Wilson.
Assault
JEFFREY WICKS | SUB | |
LISA GRAY | SUB |
Criminal Possession Weapon
KATHLEEN P. REARDON | 10 | |
LISA GRAY | 10 |
Criminal Possession Weapon
WILLIAM CLAUSS | 10 | |
LISA GRAY | 10 |
Criminal Possession Weapon
BRITTNEY NICOLE CLARK | SUB | |
LISA GRAY | 10 |
Neglect
DAVID J. PAJAK | SUB | |
REBECCA CRONAN HOFFMAN | SUB | |
JONATHAN CHOI | 5 |
Terminate Parental Rights
BRIDGET L. FIELD | 10 | |
JAMES D. BELL | 10 | |
ELIZABETH deV. MOELLER | 10 |
Summary Judgment
Summary Judgment
HUGH C. CARLIN | 15 | |
VINCENT E. DOYLE, III | 15 | |
DENNIS JEAN GARVEY | 15 | |
JAMES PATRICK MILBRAND | 15 | |
JEREMY M. SHER | 5 |
Dismiss Complaint
THOMAS RICOTTA | 15 | |
CHRISTOPHER D. THOMAS | 15 |
preliminary injunction
JEFFREY S. BOXER | 15 | |
CATHERINE MCGOVERN | 15 |
preliminary injunction
Notice of Claim
MATTHEW J. KAISER | 10 |
Notice of Claim
Summary Judgment
FRANK S. ROSENFIELD | 15 | |
DAVID M. KATZ | 15 |
Reargument
Summary Judgment
TIMOTHY M. HUDSON | 15 | |
MEGHANN N. ROEHL | 15 | |
JOHN M. CONIGLIO | 15 |
Dismiss Complaint
THOMAS RICOTTA | 15 | |
PATRICK N. BEATH | 5 |
Summary Judgment
KEVIN J. GRAFF | 15 | |
MICHAEL D. HOLLENBECK | 15 |
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.