Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Ronald D. Ploetz, J.), rendered March 19, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of coercion in the first degree (two counts), rape in the first degree (four counts), and attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree (two counts).
CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of
Attempted Sexual Abuse
| ROBERT L. KEMP | SUB | |
| MATTHEW B. POWERS | SUB |
Attempted Assault
| BARBARA J. DAVIES | SUB | |
| DAVID A. HERATY | SUB |
Sex Offender Registration Act
| DANIEL MARK GRIEBEL | SUB | |
| ELIZABETH S. HEALY | SUB |
Habeas Corpus
| NORMAN P. EFFMAN | SUB |
Assault
| PATRICK J. MARTHAGE | SUB | |
| STEVEN G. COX | SUB |
CPL art 440
Attempted Course of Sexual Conduct Against a Child
| DEBORAH K. JESSEY | 5 | |
| ASHLEY R. LOWRY | 5 |
Dismiss Claims
| JOHN A. COLLINS | 15 | |
| KEVIN T. O'BRIEN | 15 |
Summary Judgment
| THOMAS A. DIGATI | 15 | |
| PHILIP M. GULISANO | 15 | |
| CHRISTOPHER R. BITAR | 15 |
Malpractice
| JOHN C. CHERUNDOLO | 15 | |
| SAMANTHA L. MILLIER | 15 |
Summary Judgment
| JOSEPH H. EMMINGER, JR. | 10 | |
| LEONARD D. ZACCAGNINO | 10 |
Tax Certiorari
| JEFF N. EVANS | 15 | |
| BRYAN J. MAGGS | 15 | |
| DANIEL JOSEPH PALERMO | 15 |
Dismiss Complaint
Dismiss Complaint
Notice of Claim
| AARON C. GORSKI | 15 | |
| MICHAEL J. CHMIEL | 15 |
Summary Judgment
| PATRICK N. BEATH | SUB |
If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.
ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.
CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.
Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.