Remote Argument Protocols

Parties scheduled to argue must complete the email registration form using the code provided by the Clerk's office. Approximately two hours prior to the start of the argument session you will receive an email to check-in for remote arguments. More details here...

In-Person COVID-19 Argument Protocols

Pursuant to directives from the Office of Court Administration in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, all visitors to the courthouse... Expand »

404
TP 20-01019

JULIO NOVA
    V
ANTHONY ANNUCCI

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

     LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI SUB
     MARTIN A. HOTVET SUB

405
KA 19-01914

PEOPLE
    V
KEITH J. FRAREY

Sentence

  JOHN MORRISSEY SUB
     V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON SUB

406
KA 19-01737

PEOPLE
    V
LEON THOMAS

Sentence

     MELISSA SWARTZ SUB
     KENNETH H. TYLER, JR. SUB

407
KA 20-00077

PEOPLE
    V
JOHNNY Q. RUSSELL

Criminal Contempt

     KATHLEEN E. CASEY SUB
     LAURA THERESA JORDAN SUB

408
KA 17-01855

PEOPLE
    V
MICHAEL T. SCOTT

Sentence

     DREW R. DUBRIN SUB
     LEAH R. MERVINE SUB

409
KA 18-02048

PEOPLE
    V
DASHAWN SMITH

Criminal Possession Weapon

  HELEN SYME 5
  LISA GRAY 5

410
KA 18-01079

PEOPLE
    V
PARISH M. STREETER

CPL art 440

  JOHN MORRISSEY 10
  THOMAS H. BRANDT 10

411
KA 19-00930

PEOPLE
    V
JOHNTAVIOUS DODSON

Criminal Possession Forged Instrument

  PIOTR BANASIAK 10
  JESSICA N. CARBONE 5

412
KA 18-00918

PEOPLE
    V
KEVIN JOHNSON

Burglary

  BRIDGET L. FIELD 5
  JESSICA N. CARBONE 10

413
KA 17-00279

PEOPLE
    V
JOSEPH A. DEVALLE

Criminal Sale Controlled Substance

  HELEN SYME 5
  DANIEL GROSS 5

414
CAF 20-00205

IN THE MATTER OF
LIL BRIAN J.

Neglect

  LORENZO NAPOLITANO SUB
  DANA ANN GRABER SUB
  CHARLES J. PLOVANICH SUB

415
CAF 20-00240

IN THE MATTER OF
LIL BRIAN J.

Neglect

TO BE ARGUED WITH #414

416
CAF 19-02018

IN THE MATTER OF
SOPHIA

Adoption

  PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR. 10
  RICHARD A. COHEN 10
  JOHN G. KOSLOSKY 5

417
CAF 19-01841

IN THE MATTER OF
NABYHA N.

Abuse

     DAVID J. PAJAK SUB
  REBECCA CRONAN HOFFMAN SUB
  REBECCA J. TALMUD 15

418
CA 20-01139

TAMMIE LEIGH GUTIERREZ
    V
WILLIAM MICHAEL GUTIERREZ

Divorce

  JAMES P. RENDA 15
  MICHAEL J. COLLETTA 15

419
CAF 20-00357

IN THE MATTER OF
DEANGELO B.

Neglect

  PAUL B. WATKINS 10
  DONALD S. THOMSON 10
     MARY HOPE M BENEDICT SUB

420
CAF 20-00358

IN THE MATTER OF
GAKAI L.

Neglect

TO BE ARGUED WITH #419

421
CA 20-01481

STEVE HARRIS
    V
TESMER BUILDERS, INC.

Summary Judgment

     RICHARD T. SARAF SUB
  SCOTT R. ORNDOFF 15

422
CA 20-01179

JACQUELINE M. MINICH
    V
THOMAS E. NOWAK

Summary Judgment

  JONATHAN D. COX 15
  JOHN A. COLLINS 10

423
CA 20-00615

ROBERT P. MCALEAVEY
    V
CHAUTAUQUA PATRONS INSURANCE CO.

Summary Judgment

  KEVIN T. STOCKER 15
  ERIC T. BORON 15

424
CA 20-01050

WILLIE DANFORD
    V
STATE OF NEW YORK

Dismiss Claim

     WILLIE DANFORD SUB
     VICTOR PALADINO SUB

425
CA 20-01056

JOSEPH SAPIENZA
    V
CITY OF BUFFALO

CPLR art 78

  WILLIAM PATRICK MATHEWSON 15
  CHAD A. DAVENPORT 10

Calendars are Subject to Change

The calendars published here are for informational purposes only. The calendars are updated frequently but not immediately and may not reflect the status of each case posted.

Please contact the calendar department for the most current information if you have a question about the status of a case.

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.