1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
January Term

Fri Jan 22 Argument #178

CA 20-00655

ANDREW DEWOLF
    V
JAMIE SYRETT

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Wayne County (Richard M. Healy, A.J.), entered March 24, 2020. The order denied and dismissed the CPLR article 78 petition.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

158
KA 17-01804

PEOPLE
    V
BRYAN BAILEY

Criminal Sexual Act

  JANE I. YOON SUB
     JOSHUA J. TONRA SUB

159
KA 19-02203

PEOPLE
    V
ANDREW BAJEK

Sex Offender Registration Act

     DAVID R. JUERGENS SUB
     NANCY GILLIGAN SUB

160
KA 19-02206

PEOPLE
    V
YUSEF ALHAKK

Sex Offender Registration Act

     TIMOTHY SCOTT DAVIS SUB
     NANCY GILLIGAN SUB

161
KA 19-00078

PEOPLE
    V
TAYLOR T. BOJE

Criminal Contempt

     CAITLIN M. CONNELLY SUB
  V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON SUB

162
KA 20-01200

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
ROBERT BASKA

Dismiss Indictment

  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

163
KA 16-02155

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
WALTER G. FIGUEROA

Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

  HELEN SYME 5
  LISA GRAY 5

164
KA 16-01902

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
STEPHEN R. MCLAUGHLIN, JR.

Murder

     JANET C. SOMES SUB
  LEAH R. MERVINE 5

165
KA 18-02100

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
ANDRE JONES

Robbery

  JANE I. YOON 0
  KRISTIN MARKARIAN 10
  MINDY F. VANLEUVAN 10

166
KA 18-01783

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JEFFREY EMMONS

Criminal Mischief

  SARA A. GOLDFARB 10
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

167
KA 18-02090

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
CHRISTOPHER BOYD

Attempted Murder

  ERIN A. KULESUS 10
  ASHLEY R. LOWRY 5

168
CAF 19-00690

MICHAEL J. M., SR.
    V
LISA M. H.

Custody

     DAVID J. PAJAK SUB
     ANDREA ROSE CLATTENBURG SUB
     BRIAN P. DEGNAN SUB

169
CAF 18-02360

IN THE MATTER OF
KYLIE M.

Neglect

TO BE ARGUED WITH #168

170
CAF 18-02361

IN THE MATTER OF
MICHAEL M.

Neglect

TO BE ARGUED WITH #168

171
CAF 18-02362

IN THE MATTER OF
NAOMIE H.

Neglect

TO BE ARGUED WITH #168

172
CAF 20-00076

JENNIE M. VERNE
    V
ADAM J. HAMILTON

Damages

     ANTHONY F. BRIGANO SUB
     KIMBERLY ANN WOOD SUB

173
CAF 19-00561

IN THE MATTER OF
XANDER B.

Neglect

     DAVID J. PAJAK SUB
     WILLIAM D. BRODERICK, JR. SUB
     JAMES E. HARMON SUB
     JOHN MORRISSEY SUB

174
TP 20-01205

PLAY

NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
    V
RONALD E. HAWK

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

  TONI ANN HOLLIFIELD 15

175
CA 20-00448

DENNIS REX
    V
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF SENNETT

CPLR art 78

     KEVIN M. COX SUB

176
CA 20-00857

PLAY

SUSAN E. HINT
    V
DANIEL D. HINT

Divorce

  EMILY A. VELLA 10
  ALAN WILLIAMS 10

177
CA 20-00781

ALBERT WILLIAMS
    V
ANTHONY ANNUCCI

CPLR art 78

     ADAM W. KOCH SUB
     FREDERICK A. BRODIE SUB

178
CA 20-00655

PLAY

ANDREW DEWOLF
    V
JAMIE SYRETT

CPLR art 78

  ANDREW DEWOLF 30
  JAMES P. YOUNGS 15

179
CA 20-00832

PLAY

REGAN DIDAS
    V
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION

Summary Judgment

  STEVEN VINCENT DEBRACCIO 15
  JASON D. POSELOVICH 15

180
CA 20-00960

PLAY

PATRICIA VANDERHOFF
    V
FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Summary Judgment

  MARK T. WHITFORD, JR. 15
  KYLE A. SHAMBERG 10
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.