1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
January Term

Wed Jan 20 Argument #127

CAF 20-00667

KRISTEN B.
    V
STEVEN Z.

Appeal from a decision and order of the Family Court, Oneida County (James R. Griffith, J.), entered April 27, 2020, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5. The decision and order, upon reargument, dismissed the petition and amended the petition to vacate acknowledgment of paternity.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

116
KA 19-02205

PEOPLE
    V
TIMOTHY BURGESS

Sex Offender Registration Act

     TIMOTHY SCOTT DAVIS SUB
     NANCY GILLIGAN SUB

117
KA 20-00255

PEOPLE
    V
CHRISTOPHER FREEMAN

Sex Offender Registration Act

     RYAN J. MULDOON SUB
     CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA SUB

118
KA 20-00050

PEOPLE
    V
TYRONE FLOURNOY

Violation of Probation

     JOSEPH G. FRAZIER SUB
     THOMAS H. BRANDT SUB

119
KA 18-00942

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
MARKESE SMALLS

Reckless Assault on Child

  LINDA M. CAMPBELL 15
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

120
KA 20-01111

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
CODY PRUETT

Violation of Probation

  JOHN A. CIRANDO 15
  AMY LEIGH HALLENBECK 5

121
KA 17-01910

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
RICHARD DARWISH

Robbery

  DIANNE C. RUSSELL 10
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

122
KA 16-02346

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
RASHAD BURDEN

Criminal Possession Weapon

  BENJAMIN L. NELSON 10
  LISA GRAY 10

123
KA 18-01852

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JOVON MCGLOUN

Murder

     J. SCOTT PORTER SUB
  KENNETH H. TYLER, JR. 10

124
KA 19-02215

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
KEONA OWENS

Murder

  LYLE T. HAJDU 15
  DANIELLE E. PHILLIPS 15

125
CAF 19-01514

PLAY

ELIZABETH FOLEY
    V
JAMES L. DWYER

Support

  DANIELLE K. BLACKABY 10

126
CAF 19-02163

ROSEMAREE DAMICO
    V
WALTER SLUSSER

Custody

     THERESA L. PRESIOSO SUB

127
CAF 20-00667

PLAY

KRISTEN B.
    V
STEVEN Z.

Paternity

  PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR. 10
     DIANE M. MARTIN-GRANDE SUB
  COURTNEY S. RADICK 5

128
CAF 19-01543

PLAY

IN THE MATTER OF
ANDREW G.

Neglect

  THEODORE W. STENUF 10
  YVETTE VELASCO 10
     MICHAEL J. KERWIN SUB

129
CA 20-00569

PLAY

MARY P. RAYMOND
    V
JON HILLEBERT

Summary Judgment

  MATTHEW J. KAISER 15
  PAUL D. MCCORMICK 15

130
CA 20-00026

PLAY

SHARAD SHAW
    V
CITY OF ROCHESTER

Jury Trial

  VAN HENRI WHITE 15
  JOHN M. CAMPOLIETO 10

131
CA 20-00793

PLAY

PAUL BUMBOLO
    V
FAXTON ST. LUKE'S HEALTHCARE

Dismiss Complaint

  TIMOTHY S. BRENNAN 10
  MICHAEL S. ALLEN 10

132
CA 20-00064

DAVID A. CHAPMAN
    V
ADAM J. JACOBS

Summary Judgment

     G. MICHAEL MILLER SUB

133
CA 20-00303

PLAY

LLOYD CUYLER, JR.
    V
CHRISTINE SEPCIC

Summary Judgment

  TIMOTHY C. BELLAVIA 15
  LAURA B. GARDINER 15

134
CA 20-00537

PLAY

IN THE MATTER OF
KYMBER ANN VOELKER

Probate

  DENIS A. KITCHEN, JR. 10
  EDWARD J. MARKARIAN 10

135
CA 20-00538

PLAY

IN THE MATTER OF
KYMBER ANN VOEKLER

Probate

TO BE ARGUED WITH #134

136
CA 20-00136

PLAY

LOUIS S. CARTER
    V
JERMAINE PATTERSON

Summary Judgment

  MATTHEW D. PFALZER 15
  SHAWN W. CAREY 15

136.1
CA 19-00724

PLAY

PETER BRENT MCDEVITT
    V
THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Negligence

  JULIE ANN NOCIOLO 10
  BRIAN D. GINSBERG 10
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.