1. Home
  2. Term
  3. Calendar
January Term

Tue Jan 19 Argument #112

CA 19-02310

JEFFREY T. C.
    V
GRAND ISLAND CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (E. Jeannette Ogden, J.), entered November 22, 2019. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendants to dismiss the complaint.

Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

93
KA 17-00042

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
TONY PERKINS

Rape

  BRADLEY E. KEEM 10
  KAYLAN C. PORTER 10

94
KA 16-02359

PEOPLE
    V
LARRY D. MONTGOMERY

Burglary

     JANET C. SOMES SUB
     SCOTT MYLES SUB

95
KA 20-01130

PEOPLE
    V
RODNEY NEVINS

Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

     SCOTT RIORDAN SUB
     MATTHEW B. POWERS SUB

96
KA 17-00901

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JONATHAN ORTIZ

Murder

  BRIAN SHIFFRIN 10
  LEAH R. MERVINE 10

97
KA 19-01822

PEOPLE
    V
MICHAEL MAZAIKA

Sentence

     KATHLEEN E. CASEY SUB
     LAURA THERESA JORDAN SUB

98
KA 19-00091

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
STEVEN C. FELICIANO

Predatory Sexual Assault Against a Child

  PAUL B. WATKINS 10
  V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON 5

99
KA 20-00571

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
JAMES R. WILCOX

Dismiss Indictment

  AMY LEIGH HALLENBECK 10

100
KA 20-00073

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
RICHARD BAEK

Rape

  EMILY E. STOUFER-QUINN 10

101
KA 19-01905

PEOPLE
    V
TIMOTHY P. DEAN

Murder

OVER THE TERM

102
KA 18-01268

PLAY

PEOPLE
    V
COREY R. SMITH

Criminal Possession Weapon

  CHARLES J. GREENBERG 10
     NOLAN PITKIN SUB

103
CAF 19-01244

PLAY

DIANE O. TOMLINSON
    V
CHARLES HORTON

Custody

  CHARLES J. GREENBERG 5
  AYOKA APRIL TUCKER 10

104
CA 20-00494

PLAY

SHAUN BRENNAN
    V
VLADYSLAV DEMYDYUK

Discovery

     PHILIP C. BARTH, III SUB
  TIMOTHY P. WELCH 5
  LESLEY E. NIEBEL 15

105
CAF 18-02356

PLAY

IN THE MATTER OF
PAUL S.

Terminate Parental Rights

     CHARU NARANG SUB
     DONALD S. THOMSON SUB
  THOMAS V. CASE 5

106
CAF 18-02357

IN THE MATTER OF
LIAM A.

Terminate Parental Rights

TO BE ARGUED WITH #105

107
CAF 18-02358

IN THE MATTER OF
BIANCA F.

Terminate Parental Rights

TO BE ARGUED WITH #105

108
CAF 18-02359

IN THE MATTER OF
BRIANA F.

Terminate Parental Rights

TO BE ARGUED WITH #105

109
CA 20-00757

PLAY

COLLING ENTERPRISES, LLC
    V
UNITED FRONTIER MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

Contract

  JAMES GRABER 10
  JOHN A. COLLINS 10

110
CAF 20-00524

PLAY

TAMARA J. WERNER
    V
KRAIG H. KENNEY

Custody

  GARY MULDOON 10
  MICHAEL STEINBERG 10
  PAUL B. WATKINS 5

111
CA 20-00807

PLAY

SCOTT BULLOCK
    V
THE ANGRY GOAT PUB, INC.

Summary Judgment

  JESSICA E. TARIQ 15
  DAVID C. SIELING 15

112
CA 19-02310

PLAY

JEFFREY T. C.
    V
GRAND ISLAND CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Dismiss Complaint

  JASON T. BRITT 15
  BRYAN R. FORBES 10
  JOHN B. LICATA 15

113
CA 20-00642

PLAY

DOMINIC FRISCIA
    V
VILLAGE OF GENESEO

Dismiss Complaint

  JOHN T. REFERMAT 15
  D. CHARLES ROBERTS 15

114
CA 20-01059

NICHOLAS SIMS
    V
SAMUEL A. REYES, M.D.

Stay

OVER THE TERM

115
CA 20-01000

PLAY

TINA CARSWELL
    V
THEODORE R. TRAVIS

Damages

  MATTHEW J. KAISER 10
  STEVEN VINCENT DEBRACCIO 15
RULES FILING FORMS ASSIGNED COUNSEL MOTIONS PERFECTING APPEALS ARGUMENTS DECISIONS NOTICES

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.