Images and video recordings of the Court’s Justices on the Court’s website or otherwise may not be used to advance private interests or in furtherance of any commercial purpose (see Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Op. 20-158; see generally 22 NYCRR 100.2 [C], 100.4 [D] [3]).

69.1
CAF 20-00247

PATRICK J. HANKINSON
    V
ASHLEY M. STEELE

Custody

  BRADLEY E. KEEM 10
  LISA DIPOALA HABER 10
  KAREN JUNE DOCTER 15

46
KA 17-02052

PEOPLE
    V
ROBERT SMITH

Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

  BARBARA J. DAVIES SUB
     MICHAEL J. HILLERY SUB

47
KA 17-02053

PEOPLE
    V
ROBERT SMITH

Criminal Possession Controlled Substance

TO BE ARGUED WITH #46

48
KA 19-00733

PEOPLE
    V
JOHN P. MORANA

Sex Offender Registration Act

OVER THE TERM

49
KA 19-00089

PEOPLE
    V
CHRISTIAN DAVIDSON

Criminal Possession Stolen Property

     ROBERT L. KEMP SUB
     MICHAEL J. HILLERY SUB

50
KA 19-00090

PEOPLE
    V
CHRISTIAN DAVIDSON

Attempted Rape

TO BE ARGUED WITH #49

51
KA 12-00216

PEOPLE
    V
VLADIMIR V. VERIN

Violation of Probation

     PATRICK J. MARTHAGE SUB
     STEVEN G. COX SUB

52
KA 19-00151

PEOPLE
    V
DEMETRIUS HOLLINGSWORTH

Criminal Possession Weapon

  BARBARA J. DAVIES 5
  DAVID A. HERATY 5

53
KA 17-00971

PEOPLE
    V
JERRY MCLAMORE

Promoting Prison Contraband

  GARY MULDOON 15
  CHELSIE A. ROBERTS 5

54
KA 20-00592

PEOPLE
    V
NISSAR MOORE

Suppression

  KENNETH H. TYLER, JR. 10
  THOMAS MANNING LEITH 10

55
KA 18-00300

PEOPLE
    V
LEMORRIS DEXTER

Criminal Possession Forged Instrument

  SARA A. GOLDFARB 5
  DARIENN P. BALIN 10

56
KA 18-01541

PEOPLE
    V
DAWUD ABDULLAH

Criminal Possession Weapon

  PHILIP ROTHSCHILD 10
  BRADLEY W. OASTLER 10

57
CA 20-00299

CENTERLINE/FLEET HOUSING PARTNERSHIP
    V
HOPKINS COURT APARTMENTS, L.L.C.

Reargument/Renewal

  ERIC S. PETTIT 15
  DAVID A. DAVENPORT 15

58
TP 20-01153

RUTHIE MCELROY
    V
NYS OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES

CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of

  JONATHAN G. JOHNSEN 15
  ALLYSON B. LEVINE 10

59
CA 20-00866

IN THE MATTER OF
SYRACUSE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT (ROCHELLE GILBERT)

Arbitration

  KATE I. REID 10
  ELIZABETH SCHUSTER 15

60
CA 19-01806

TERRY SLOWE
    V
LECESSE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC

Summary Judgment

  TIMOTHY M. HUDSON 15
  VALERIE L. BARBIC 15

61
CA 19-00144

STEPHEN T. DIVITO
    V
PETER J. GLENNON

Dismiss Complaint

  ROBERT J. LUNN 10
  LAURA K. FIGUERAS 15

62
CA 20-00333

MIDTOWN MARKET MISSOURI CITY, TX., LLC
    V
SH SALON LLC

Summary Judgment

  ROBERT J. LUNN 15
  CURTIS ALAN JOHNSON 15

63
CA 20-01128

AMY L. ALEXANDER
    V
STATE OF NEW YORK

Summary Judgment

  MATTHEW J. KELLY 10
  DAVID B. GEURTSEN 10

64
CA 19-02169

ROBERT L. DODGE
    V
ERNEST W. BAKER, JR.

Summary Judgment

     MATTHEW R. ST. MARTIN SUB

65
CA 20-00653

DAVID MOLTRUP
    V
LINDA JOYCE REID

Summary Judgment

     AARON MARK ZIMMERMAN SUB
     KRISTIN L. NORFLEET SUB

66
CA 20-00799

DAVID MOLTRUP
    V
LINDA JOYCE REID

Personal Injury

TO BE ARGUED WITH #65

67
CA 20-00584

BRYAN R. BAUM
    V
JAVEN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

Labor Law

  H. CHRISTOPHER BARTOLOMUCCI 15
  SAMUEL J. CAPIZZI 20

68
CA 19-01941

ACADEMY SQUARE APARTMENTS HOUSING
    V
ASSESSOR OF CITY OF UTICA

Dismiss Petition

  KATHRYN FESTINE HARTNETT 10
  KEVIN GREGORY ROE 10

69
CA 20-00169

ACADEMY SQUARE APARTMENTS HOUSING
    V
ASSESSOR OF CITY OF UTICA

Summary Judgment

TO BE ARGUED WITH #68

ACCESSIBILITY

If you are unable to access the archive of a particular argument because of a disability, please contact Alan Ross, Deputy Clerk of the Court and the Court’s designated ADA Liaison (by e-mail at aross@nycourts.gov or by telephone at 585-530-3102), to request a reasonable accommodation.

Hearing Assistance

ASSISTED LISTENING devices are available in each courtroom during arguments. Please see a court attendant when you enter the courtroom.

CLOSED CAPTIONING is available while viewing archived (not live) oral arguments. Hover your mouse over the video and click the [cc] icon to activate the captions. Please note: these captions are generated by a computer algorithm and are not considered a transcript of the proceedings.

Periodically the court may suspend a broadcast to protect the privacy interests of individuals in matters before the Court.

  Comment  Share your thoughts, comments or suggestions as part of the Court's Excellence Initiative.